Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T22:53:09.429Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Preliminary Study on Cell Wall Architecture of Titanium Foams

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Nihan Tuncer
Affiliation:
nihant@anadolu.edu.trnihantuncer@gmail.com, Anadolu University, Material Science and Engineering, Eskisehir, Turkey
Luc Salvo
Affiliation:
luc.salvo@phelma.grenoble-inp.fr, INP Grenoble, SIMAP Lab., Grenoble, France
Eric Maire
Affiliation:
eric.maire@insa-lyon.fr, INSA Lyon, MATEIS Lab, Lyon, France
Gürsoy Arslan
Affiliation:
garslan@anadolu.edu.tr, Anadolu University, Material Science and Engineering, Eskisehir, Turkey
Get access

Abstract

Bio-inspired architectures, especially metallic foams, have been receiving an increasing interest for the last 10 years due to their unusual mechanical properties. Among commonly dealt foamed metals, like aluminum and steel, titanium possesses a distinctive place because of its high strength-to-weight ratio, excellent corrosion resistance and biocompatibility. In this study, Ti foams were produced by a very simple and common method, sintering under inert atmosphere with fugitive space holder. Removal of the space holder was conducted by dissolution in hot deionized water which makes it possible to minimize contamination of Ti. Sintering of remaining Ti skeleton at 1300 °C offered a wide range of properties and cost savings. The effects of the processing parameters such as sintering temperature and powder characteristics on the 3D foam architecture were investigated by using X-ray microtomography (μ-CT). Use of bimodal Ti powders caused a decrease in final theoretical density when compared to the ones prepared with the same amount of space holder but with monomodal Ti powders. It was also observed that the use of bimodal Ti powders decreased compressive strength, by introducing pores into the cell walls, when compared to the ones having the same theoretical density.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Banhart, J., Progress Mater. Sci,. 46, 559 (2001).10.1016/S0079-6425(00)00002-5Google Scholar
2 Balch, D. K., O'Dawyer, J. G., Davis, G. R., Cady, C. M., Gray, G. T., Dunand, D. C., Mater. Sci. Eng. A 391 (2005) p. 408.10.1016/j.msea.2004.09.012Google Scholar
3 Park, C., Nutt, S. R., Mater. Sci. Eng. A 323, 358 (2002).10.1016/S0921-5093(01)01372-7Google Scholar
4 Jiang, B., Zhao, N.Q., Shi, C.S., Li, J.J., Scripta Mater, 53, 781, (2005).10.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.04.055Google Scholar
5 Salimon, A., Bréchet, Y., Ashby, M. F., Greer, A. L., J. of Mater. Sci,. 40, 5793 (2005).10.1007/s10853-005-4993-xGoogle Scholar
6 Gibson, L. J., Ve Ashby, M.F., Cellular Solids, Second Edition, Cambridge Solid State Science Series, ISBN 0-521-49560-1, (1997).Google Scholar
7 Tuncer, N., Arslan, G., J. of Mater. Sci. 44, 6, 1477 (2009).10.1007/s10853-008-3167-zGoogle Scholar
8 Roberts, A.P., Garboczi, E.J., J. Mech. Physics of Solids, 50, 33 (2002).10.1016/S0022-5096(01)00056-4Google Scholar
9 Salvo, L., Cloetens, P., Maire, E., Zabler, S., J.J. Blandin , Buffiere, J.Y., Ludwig, W., Boller, E., Bellet, D., Josserond, C., Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Res B 200, 273, (2003)10.1016/S0168-583X(02)01689-0Google Scholar
10Ariane Marmottant, PhD Thesis, INPG, December 8th, France, (2006).Google Scholar
11 Simone, A.E., Gibson, L.J., Acta Mater. 46, 3929 (1998).10.1016/S1359-6454(98)00072-XGoogle Scholar