Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Prediction of Uranium Adsorption by Crystalline Rocks: The Key Role of Reactive Surface Area

  • Richard B. Wanty (a1), Cynthia A. Rice (a1), Donald Langmuir (a2), Paul Briggs (a1) and Errol P. Lawrence (a3)...

Abstract

Adsorption processes are important in controlling U concentrations in ground water. Quantifying such processes is extremely difficult in that in situ conditions cannot be directly measured. One rock characteristic that must be known to quantify adsorption is the specific surface area of reactive minerals exposed to the ground water. We evaluate here three methods for estimating specific surface area in situ. The first is based on the dissolution kinetics of sodium feldspars, the second on emanation of radon-222 and the third on adsorption of naturally-occurring U. The radon-222 method yields estimates 5 to 8 orders of magnitude greater than those obtained via the other two methods; too large probably because of effects related to fracture geometry. Estimates of specific surface area based on modelling adsorption of natural U by aquifer materials are of comparable magnitude to those from the feldspar-dissolution kinetics approach. These conclusions are based on analyses of water from 145 wells in crystalline-rock aquifers from Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Maryland, and Colorado. Computer modelling of the chemical data using PHREEQE [1] showed that uraninite or coffinite approach saturation in reducing water, limiting total U to <2 × 10−9 m. Generally, U minerals are below saturation in oxidizing ground water, where uranyl-carbonate complexes are the dominant dissolved U species. Autoradioluxographs of thin sections show areas of concentration of radioactivity in the rocks and establish that U is concentrated along fracture boundaries and on ferric oxyhydroxide grain coatings. Because U minerals generally are undersaturated, U mobility is limited by adsorption onto ferric oxyhydroxides and other mineral surfaces. Calculations of uranyl adsorption from the ground water onto goethite using the program M1NTEQ [2] show that adsorption decreases with increased carbonate concentrations due to the formation of uranyl-carbonate complexes. Results of this paper improve our understanding of the mobility of U that might be released into oxidized ground water in crystalline rock from a breached radioactive-waste repository.

Copyright

References

Hide All
1. Parkhurst, D.L., Thorstenson, D.C., Plummer, L.N., U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations 80–96 (1980), 210 p.
2. Brown, D.S., Allison, J.D., Report EPA/600/3-87/012, (Environmental Protection Agency, 1987).
3. Gascoyne, M., Appl. Geochem. 4 (6), 577 (1989).
4. Langmuir, D., in Coupled Processes Associated with Nuclear Waste Repositories, edited by Tsang, C.-F., (Academic Press, Inc., Orlando, Florida, 1987), p. 67.
5. Krishnaswami, S., Graustein, W.C., Turekian, K.K., Dowd, J.F., Water Resources Research 18 (6), 1633 (1982).
6. Neretnieks, I., J. Geophys. Res. 85, 4379 (1980).
7. Langmuir, D., Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 42, 547 (1978).
8. Skougstad, M.W., Fishman, M.J., Friedman, L.C., Erdmann, D.E., Duncan, S.S., Techniques of Water-Resources Investigations of the U.S. Geological Survey, Book 5, Ch. A5 U.S. Gov’t Printing Office, 1979), 626 p.
9. Wood, W.W., Techniques of Water-Resources Investigations of the U.S. Geological Survey, Book 1, Ch. D2 (U.S. Gov’t Printing Office, 1976), 24 p.
10. Wanty, R.B., Gundersen, L.C.S., in Geological Causes of Natural Radionuclide Anomalies, edited by Marikos, M.A., Hansman, R.H., (Missouri Department of Natural Resources, St. Louis, MO, 1988), p. 147.
11. Krupka, K., Report PNL–4333 (Pacific Northwest Laboratories, 1983).
12. Smith, R.W., Jenne, E.A., Report PNL–6754 (Pacific Northwest Laboratories, 1988).
13. Hsi, C.-K.D., Thesis, Ph. D., Colorado School of Mines (1981).
14. Paòes, T., Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 37, 2641 (1973).
15. Hammond, D.E., Leslie, B.W., Ku, T.-L., Torgersen, T., Geophys. Res. Let. 15 (9), 1045 (1988).
16. Torgersen, T., Benoit, J., Mackie, D., Geophys. Res. Let. 17 (6), 845 (1990).
17. Wanty, R.B., Lawrence, E.P., Gundersen, L.C.S., edited by Gates, A., Gundersen, L.C.S., Geological Society of America Special Papers Series, (in press).
18. Helgeson, H.C., Murphy, W.M., Aagaard, P., Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 48, 2405 (1984).
19. White, A.F., Peterson, M.L., in Chemical Modeling of Aqueous Systems II, edited by Melchior, D.C., Bassett, R.L., (American Chemical Society, Washington, D.C, 1990), p. 461.
20. Hicks, J.R., Thesis, M.S., Colorado School of Mines (1987).
21. Riese, A.C., Thesis, Ph.D., Colorado School of Mines (1982).
22. Andrews, J.N., Ford, D.J., Hussain, N., Trivedi, D., Youngman, M.J., Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 53, 1791 (1989).
23. Novakowski, K.S., in Fourth Canadian/American conference on hydrogeology: Fluid flow, heat transfer and mass transport in fractured rocks, edited by Hitchon, B., Bachu, S., (National Water Well Association, Dublin, Ohio, 1988), p. 68.
24. Scott, R.C., Barker, F.B., U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 426 (1962), 115 p.
25. Freeze, R.A., Cherry, J.A., Groundwater (Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1979), 604 p.
26. Nordstrom, D.K., Olsson, T., Carlsson, L., Fritz, P., Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 53, 1717 (1989).
27. Andrews, J.N., Giles, I.S., Kay, R.L.F., Lee, D.J., Osmond, J.K., Cowart, J.B., Fritz, P., Barker, J.F., Gale, J., Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 46, 1533 (1982).
28. Nordstrom, D.K., Ball, J.W., Donahoe, R.J., Whittemore, D., Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 53,1727 (1989).
29. McHugh, J.B., U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 79–249 (1979), 14 p.
30. Paòes, T., Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 47 (11), 1855 (1983).
31. Lichte, F.E., Golightly, D.W., Lamothe, P.J., U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 1770 (1987), B1.
32. Fishman, M.J., Pyen, G., U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 79–101 (1979).
33. Hsi, C.-K D., Langmuir, D., Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 49, 1931 (1985).

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

Prediction of Uranium Adsorption by Crystalline Rocks: The Key Role of Reactive Surface Area

  • Richard B. Wanty (a1), Cynthia A. Rice (a1), Donald Langmuir (a2), Paul Briggs (a1) and Errol P. Lawrence (a3)...

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.