Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T17:05:06.927Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Pottery Technology from Bukit Tengkorak, a 3000–5000 Year Old Site in Borneo, Malaysia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

Pamela Vandiver  and
Stephen Chia
Pamela Vandiver
Affiliation:
Conservation Analytical Laboratory, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C., USA, PBV@CAL.SI.edu
Stephen Chia
Affiliation:
Centre for Archaeological Research, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 11800 P. Penang, Malaysia, arkeo@pc.jaring.my
Get access

Extract

Bukit Tengkorak (Scull Hill) is a Neolithic period rock shelter complex and prehistoric pottery production site in southeastern Sabah, about 5 miles southwest of Semporna in Borneo, Malaysia at GPS N 4 7 20.08 and E 118 37 04.3. It was excavated for a 5-week season in 1995 and another in 1994 by a joint University of Science and Sabah Museum team under the direction of S. Chia. Two areas with volcanic outcrops about 10 meters apart were excavated. A total of 6 one-meter squares, three in each area, were excavated in 5 cm layers. The three rock shelter trenches, G17, G19 and J19, were excavated to the base of undisturbed cultural deposits, about one and one half meters deep. The main archaeological materials excavated from these squares comprised pottery sherds, stone tools, molluscs and fish and animal bones. Thick layers of ash, measuring 50 to 80 cm, were associated with the pottery sherds in the three rock shelter squares, suggesting that they could have been the remnant of an open pit kiln or pit kilns used for firing the pottery. In the lower outcrop, the three trenches R13, S37 and T38, were excavated near earlier archaeological excavation by Bellwood (1). Our excavation in this area revealed large deposits of clays not found elsewhere in this locale that were probably brought to the shelter to be used as raw material for making pottery. No food remains such as animal and fish bones or unworked shells were found in this area, leading credence to the interpretation of this as a craft working area for the production of pottery and stone and shell tools.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 462: Symposium DD – Materials Issues in Art and Archaeology V , 1996 , 269
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Bellwood, P. and Koon, P., “Lapita colonists leave boats unburned? The question of Lapita Links with Southeast Asia,” Antiquity 63 (1989) 613–622.Google Scholar
2. Kirch, P.V., The Lapita Peoples: Ancestors of the Oceanic World, Blackwell, 1997, esp.ch. 1, 3 and 5; andGoogle Scholar
Irwin, G., The Prehistoric Exploration and Colonization of the Pacific, Cambridge Univ. Press, 1992, esp. ch. 3 and 5, and p. 32.Google Scholar
3. Terrell, J.E. and Welsch, R.L., “Lapita and the Temporal Geography of Prehistory”, ras. submitted to Antiquity, 1996, andGoogle Scholar
Terrell, J.E., Hunt, T.L. and Gosden, C., “The Dimensions of Social Life in the Pacific,” ras. accepted in Current Anthropology.Google Scholar
4. Vandiver, P., “Sequential Slab Construction: Conservative Southwest Asiatic Ceramic Tradition, ca. 7000–3000 B.C.,” Paleorient, vol. 13/2, 1987, pp. 9–35, andGoogle Scholar
Vandiver, P., “The Production Technology of Early Pottery at Mehrgarh”, in Mehrqarh: Field Reports 1974–1985 from Meolithis Times to the Indus Civilization, ed Jarrige, C., Jarrige, J.-F., Meadow, R.H. and Quivron, G., Dept. of Culture and Tourism, Govt. of Sindh, Pakistan and French Ministry of Foreign Affairs, pp. 64B–661.Google Scholar
5. Vandiver, P., “The Implications of Variation in Ceramic Technology : The Forming of Neolithic Storage Jars in China and the Wear East,” Archeomaterials, vol. 2/2, Spring 1988, p. 139–174.Google Scholar
6. Vandiver, P.B. and Tumosa, C.S., “Xeroradiographic Imaging’, in Am. Jour, of Archaeol., 99 (1995) 121–124.Google Scholar
7. Publication forthcoming.Google Scholar