Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T07:24:45.180Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Porous Morphology and Oxidation Kinetics in a-Si:H RF Sputtered by He/H2

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

J. Shinar ,
R. Shinar ,
S. Mitra ,
M. L. Albers ,
H. R. Shanks  and
T. D. Moustakas
J. Shinar
Affiliation:
Ames Laboratory and Physics Department, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011
R. Shinar
Affiliation:
Hicroelectronics Research Center, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011
S. Mitra
Affiliation:
Ames Laboratory and Physics Department, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011
M. L. Albers
Affiliation:
Ames Laboratory and Physics Department, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011
H. R. Shanks
Affiliation:
Ames Laboratory and Physics Department, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011 Hicroelectronics Research Center, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011
T. D. Moustakas
Affiliation:
Corporate Research Laboratories, Exxon Research and Engineering Co., Clinton Township, Annandale, NJ 08801
Get access

Abstract

a-Si:H films rf sputtered in 10 mT He and 0.5 mT H2, in contrast to those prepared in Ar/H2 or Xe/H2, exhibit port depositional oxidation when sputtered at power levels of 0.55 – 3.3 W/cm2 (100 – 600W). SEM measurements show that the morphology of the films evolves from a cracked, microcrystalline, glassy one at higher rf power levels to a porous one at low power levels. This trend is also correlated with a sharply increasing density of Si-H2 dihydride bonds at decreasing rf levels. Auger depth profiles of the oxygen concentration in the films agree with a diffusion controlled process of a source solute of O2 molecules into a semi-infinite solid solvent. Yet IR absorption measurements indicate that the oxygen is confined to the internal surfaces of the microvoids. The diffusion constant is a very sensitive functi n of the sputtering conditions. At low rf power levels, it is as low as 10−16 – 10−1 cm2 /sec at room temperature, but increases to ∼10−13 at 250 – 350°C.These results are discussed in terms of a porous network of microvoids, through which the O2 “squeezes” into the film.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 95: Symposium E – Amorphous Silicon Semiconductors--Pure and Hydrogenated , 1987 , 183
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Joannopoulos, J.D. and Lucovsky, G., eds., The Physics of Hydrogenated Amorphous Silicon (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1984).Google Scholar
2. Messier, R. and Ross, R.C., J. Appl. Phys. 53, 6220 (1982).Google Scholar
3. Ross, R.C. and Messier, R., J. Appl. Phys. 54, 5744 (1983).Google Scholar
4. Albers, M.L., Shanks, H.R., and Shinar, J., in SPIE Vol. 653 Optical Materials Technology for Energy Efficiency and Solar Energy Conversion V (1986), edited by Granqvist, C.G., Lampert, G.M., Mason, J., and Wittmer, V. p. 301.Google Scholar
5. Tsai, C.C., Wacker, B., Thompson, R., and Knights, J.C., Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 32, 587 (1987).Google Scholar
6. Koropecki, R.R., Arce, R., and Ferron, J., Appl. Surf. Sci. 25, 321 (1986).Google Scholar
7. Albers, M.L., Shanks, H.R., and Shinar, J., in Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Vol. 70, Materials Issues in Amorphous Semiconductor Technology, edited by Adler, D., Hamakawa, Y., and Madan, A. (Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, PA, 1986) p. 59.Google Scholar
8. Tauc, J., Grigorivici, R., and Vancu, A., in Amorphous and Liquid Semiconductors, edited by Tauc, J. (Plenum Press, New York, 1974).Google Scholar
9. Ley, L., in The Physics of Hydrogenated Amorphous Silicon, edited by Joannopolous, J.D. and Lucovsky, G. (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1984) Vol.2.Google Scholar
10. Brodsky, M.H., Cardona, M., and Cuomo, J.J., Phys. Rev. B 16, 3556 (1977).Google Scholar
11. Cardona, M., Phys. Stat. Sol. 118, 463 (1983).Google Scholar
12. Anderson, D., Moddel, G., Paesler, M.A., and Paul, W., J. Vac. Sci. Tech. 16, 906 (1979).Google Scholar
13. Shewmon, P.G., Diffusion in Solids (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1963) Chap.l.Google Scholar
14. Leopold, D.J., Fedders, P.A., Norberg, R.E., Boyce, J.B., and Knights, J.C., Phys. Rev. B 31, 5642 (1985); P.A. Fedders, R. Fisch, and R.E. Norberg, Phys. Rev. B 31, 6887T (1985).Google Scholar