Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T21:44:55.334Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Polymer-Gel Phase-Transition as the Mechanism of Muscle Contraction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

Gerald H. Pollack*
Affiliation:
Dept. of Bioengineering, University of Washington Box 357962, Seattle, WA 98102–7962
Get access

Abstract

The thesis offered here is that the muscle-contraction mechanism is similar to the mechanism of contraction in many artificial muscles. Artificial muscles typically contract by a phasetransition. Muscle is thought to contract by a sliding-filament mechanism in which one set of filaments is driven past another by the action of cyclically rotating cross-bridges—much like the mechanism of rowing. However, the evidence is equally consistent with a mechanism in which the filaments themselves contract, much like the condensation of polymers during a phasetransition. Muscle contains three principal polymer types organized neatly within a framework. All three can shorten. The contributions of each filament may be designed to confer maximum strength, speed and versatility on this biological machine. The principles of natural contraction may be useful in establishing optimal design principles for artificial muscles.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1) Baatsen, P. H. W. W., Trombitas, K., and Pollack, G. H., "Thick filaments of striated muscle are laterally interconnected", J. Ultras. & Mol. Str. Res. 97, pp. 3949, 1988.Google Scholar
2) Trombitas, K., Baatsen, P. H. W. W., and Pollack, G. H., "I-bands of striated muscle contain lateral struts", J. Ultras. & Mol. Str. Res. 100, pp. 1330, 1988.Google Scholar
3) Pollack, G. H., Muscle and Molecules: Uncovering the Principles of Biological Motion, 1990.Google Scholar
4) Iwazumi, T., "A new field theory of muscle contraction", Ph. D. Dissertation, Univ. of Pennsylvania, 1970.Google Scholar
5) Pollack, G. H., "The cross-bridge theory." Physiol. Reviews 63, pp. 1049–113, 1983.Google Scholar
6) Schutt, C. E., and Lindberg, U., "Actin as a generator of tension during muscle contraction", Proc. Nat'l. Acad. Sci. 89, pp. 319–23, 1992.Google Scholar
7) Oplatka, A., "The rise, decline, and fall of the swinging crossbridge dogma", Chemiracts Bioch. Mol. Biol. 6, pp. 1860, 1996.Google Scholar
8) Oplatka, A., "Critical review of the swinging cross-bridge theory and of the cardinal active role of water in muscle contraction", Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 32, pp. 307–60, 1997.Google Scholar
9) Rief, M., Gautel, M., Oesterhelt, F., Fernander, J. M., and Gaub, H. E., "Reversible unfolding of individual titin immunoglobulin domains by AFM", Science 276, pp. 1109–12, 1997.Google Scholar
10) Tskhovrebova, L., Trinick, J., Sleep, J. A., and Simmons, R. M., "Elasticity and unfolding of single molucules of the giant muscle protein titin", Nature 387, pp. 308–12, 1997.Google Scholar
11) Yang, P., Tameyasu, T., and Pollack, G. H., "Stepwise dynamics of connecting filaments measured in single myofibril sarcomeres", Biophys. J. 74, pp. 1473–83, 1998.Google Scholar
12) Granzier, H. L. M., and Pollack, G. H., "Stepwise shortening in unstimulated frog skeletal muscle fibres", J. Physiol. 362, pp. 173–88, 1985.Google Scholar
13) Huxley, H. E., and Brown, W., "The low angle X-ray diagram of vertebrate striated muscle and its behaviour during contraction and rigor", J. Mol. Biol. 39, pp. 383434, 1967.Google Scholar
14) Yagi, N., and Matsubara, I., "Cross-bridge movements during slow length change of active muscle", Biophys. J 45, pp. 611–4, 1984.Google Scholar
15) Osada, Y., Gong, J., Prog. Polym. Sci. 18, pp. 187, 1993.Google Scholar
16) Pollack, G. H., "Phase transitions and the molecular mechanism of contraction." Biophys. Chem. 59, pp. 315–28, 1996.Google Scholar
17) Menetret, J. F., Hoffman, W., Schroder, R. R., Gapp, R., Goody, R. S., "Time-resolved cryoelectron microscopic study of the dissociation of actomyosin induced by photolysis of photolabile nucleotides." J. Mol. Biol. 219, pp. 139–44, 1991.Google Scholar
18) Prochniewicz, E., Zhang, Q., Janmey, P. A., Thomas, D. D., "Cooperativity in F-actin: Binding of gelsolin at the barbed end affects structure and dynamics of the whole filament." J. Mol. Biol. 260, pp. 756–66, 1996.Google Scholar
19) deBeer, E. L., Sontrop, A. M. A T. A., Kellermayer, M. S. Z., Pollack, G. H., "Actin-filament motion in the in vitro motility assay has a periodic component." Cell Motil. Cytoskel. 38, pp. 341–50, 1997.Google Scholar
20) Blyakhman, F., Shklyar, T., Pollack, G. H., "Quantal length changes in single contracting sarcomeres" J. Mus Res. Cell Motility, 20, 529538, 1999.Google Scholar
21) Pollack, G. H., Iwazumi, T., Keurs, H. E. D. J. ter, and Shibata, E. F., "Sarcomere shortening in striated muscle occurs in stepwise fashion", Nature 268, pp. 757–9, 1977.Google Scholar
22) Harrington, W. F., "On the origin of the contractile force in skeletal muscle." Proc. Nat'l. Acad. Sci. 76, pp. 5066–70, 1979.Google Scholar