Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qlrfm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T04:38:29.224Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Plasma Deposited Carbosilicon Films from Silane-Phenylsilane Mixtures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

J. A. Cutro
Affiliation:
IBM Thomas J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY 10598
Ivan Haller
Affiliation:
IBM Thomas J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY 10598
Get access

Abstract

A series of amorphous silicon/carbon films were deposited from an RF glow discharge in silane-phenylsilane feed gas mixtures with the (ΦSiH3 content varying from 0 to 100 %. The films were characterized with optical and electrical measurements. While the structure of the films deposited from the mixtures contains carbon in more than one configuration the amount of pendant phenyl groups increases as the phenylsilane content of the feed gas is increased. The optical gap, derived from Tauc plots of the absorption spectra, ranges from 1.7 to 2.9 eV, while the refractive index obtained from ellipsometry, ranges from 3.7 to 1.8. The optical gap was found to vary linearly with the carbon atomic fraction in the feed gas, independent of the configuration of carbon atoms in the solid. The refractivity, (n2− 1)/(n2 + 2) , was found to exhibit a similar composition dependence. The room temperature resistivity was observed to increase sharply with increasing carbon content, rising from 107 ohm-cm to 1016 ohm-cm as the ΦSiH3 content of the feed gas was increased from 0 to 25 per cent.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Haller, I., J. Electrochem. Soc. 129, 180 (1982).Google Scholar
2. Oelhafen, P., Cutro, J.A. and Haller, I., J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 34, 105 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Anderson, D.A. and Spear, W.E., Phil. Mag. 35, 1 (1977).Google Scholar
4. Wieder, H., Cardona, M. and Guarnieri, C.R., Phys. Stat. Sol. B92, 99 (1979).Google Scholar
5. Catherine, Y. and Turban, G., Thin Solid Films 60, 193 (1979).Google Scholar
6. Sussmann, R.S. and Ogden, R., Phil. Mag. B44, 137 (1981).Google Scholar
7. Morimoto, A., Miura, T., Kumeda, M., and Shimizu, T., J. Appl. Phys. 53, 7299 (1982).Google Scholar
8. Tawada, Y., Tsuge, K., Kondo, M., Okamoto, H., and Hamakawa, Y., J. Appl. Phys. 53, 5273 (1982).Google Scholar
9. Azzam, R.M.A. and Bashara, N.M., Ellipsometry and Polarized Light, (North Holland, Amsterdam, 1977).Google Scholar
10. Tauc, J., Amorphous and Liquid Semiconductors, (Plenum, New York, 1974), Chapt. 4.Google Scholar
11. Ast, D.G. and Brodsky, M.H., Phil. Mag. B41, 273 (1980).Google Scholar
12. Tawada, Y., Kondo, M., Okamoto, H., and Hamakawa, Y., Solar Energy Materials 6, 299 (1982).Google Scholar
13. Zelez, J., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 2, 305 (1983).Google Scholar
14. Solomon, I., Perrin, J. and Bourdon, B., Physics of Semiconductors 1978, Conf. Ser. 43, (The Institute of Physics, London, 1979), p. 689.Google Scholar