Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T05:37:44.762Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Performance of Precipitated Calcium Carbonate Fillers in Fine Quality Printing and Writing Papers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 February 2011

Robert A. Gill*
Affiliation:
Pfizer Inc., 9 Highland Ave., Bethlehem, PA 18017
Get access

Abstract

The trend toward alkaline papermaking has accelerated over the past four years due to the availability of inexpensive, high quality precipitated calcium carbonate. This movement has been largely brought about through on-site production of precipitated calcium carbonate (PCC). Over ten facilities exist in North America providing the host mills with custom-made PCC products to provide specific properties for the paper grades being manufactured.

Laboratory studies were recently conducted to investigate the performance of paper-grade PCC fillers in fine quality printing papers. This investigation focused on the effect of changes in PCC particle size, size distribution, surface area, and morphology on paper properties. The PCC fillers were also compared to other filler materials such as ground limestone and kaolin.

In general, the results show that sheet properties are greatly influenced by the size and shape of the PCC product used. The data reveal strong correlations between average particle size and/or surface area, and sheet properties such as opacity, porosity, tensile strength, bulk, and sizing within certain filler morphologies.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Gill, R. A., The Influence of Calcium Carbonate Filler Picyment Characteristics on Paper Properties – Thesis, Miami University, Oxford, OH, (1983).Google Scholar
2. Gill, R. A., Satellite PCC – The Behavior of Various CaCOn Fillers and Blends on Paper Properties, (TAPPI Papermakers Conference Proceedings, Chicago, IL 1988) pp. 3954.Google Scholar
3. Gill, R. A., The Retention, Drainage, and Optical Performance of On-Site Synthesized PCC Fillers, (CPPA Annual Conference Proceedings, Montreal, Canada 1989), Book A, pp. 307311.Google Scholar
4. Gill, R. A., Nordic Pulp and Paper Research J., 4 (2), 120127 (1989).Google Scholar
5. Gildea, C., Mathur, V. K., and Malcolm, J., A Successful Alkaline Start-Up, (CPPA Annual Conference Proceedings, Montreal, Canada 1990), Book A, pp. 7587.Google Scholar
6. Zeller, R. C., Optical Properties of CaCO3 in Paper Coatings, (TAPPI Coating Conference Proceedings, Miami, FL 1980) pp. 103109.Google Scholar
7. Pictments for Paper, edited by Hagemeyer, R. W. (TAPPI Press, Atlanta, GA 1984) pp. 56, 57, 114. Google Scholar
8. Koppelman, M. H., The Effect of Clay and TiO- Extenders on Paper Opacity, (TAPPI Papermakers Conference Proceedings, Chicago, IL 1981) p. 197.Google Scholar
9. Strutz, M. D., Pflieger, J. C., and Duncan, P. A., CaCO3 Filler Optimization for Alkaline Paper, (CPPA Annual Conference Proceedings, Montreal, Canada 1989), Book A pp. 9195.Google Scholar
10. Walkden, S. A., Alkaline Papermaking – An Overview of Current and Future Market Conditions and Applications of AKD Sizes, (CPPA Annual Conference Proceedings, Montreal, Canada 1989), Book A pp. 5155.Google Scholar
11. Kurrle, F. L., TAPPI J., 63 (7), 100102 (1980).Google Scholar