Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-mwx4w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-22T15:25:35.437Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Optimization of Pd/Zn/Pd/Au Ohmic Contacts to p-Type inGaAs/ InP

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

Patrick W Leech
Affiliation:
Telecom Research Laboratories, Clayton, 3168, Victoria Australia.
Geoffrey K. Reeves
Affiliation:
Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Get access

Abstract

The electrical properties of Pd/Zn/Pd/Au based ohmic contacts to p-type In0 47Ga0 53As/ InP with an interposed superlattice of 50Å In047Gao 53As/ 50 Å InP have been investigated. In this study, several configurations of the Pd/Zn/Pd/Au metallization were fabricated with varying thicknesses of the Zn and interfacial Pd layers in the range 0 to 400 Å. The lowest values of specific contact resistance, ρc, were 1.2 x 10-5 Ω cm2 as-deposited and 7.5 x 106 Ω cm2 for samples annealed at 500 °C. In the as-deposited structures, ρc was reduced by an increase in thickness of both the Zn and Pd layers to 300 Å. For annealed samples, a critical thickness of the Zn ≥ 50 Å and Pd ≥ 100 Å layers was required in order to significantly reduce the magnitude of ρc. These results are consistent with a model of Pd/Zn contacts based on Zn doping of the interface. Studies of thermal stability of the contacts at 400 °C and 500 °C have shown that the Zn/Pd/Au and Pd/Zn/Pd/Au configurations were significanty lower in ρc at extended ageing times than the Pd/Au contacts.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Wasserbauer, J.G. Bowers, J.E., Hafich, M.J., Silvestre, P., Woods, L.M. and Robinson, G.Y., Electron Lett., 28 (17), 1568, (1992).Google Scholar
2 Leech, P.W. and Reeves, G.K., in Interface Control of Electrical. Chemical and Mechanical Properties, edited by Murarka, S., Ohmi, T., Rose, K. and Seidel, T., Mater.Res.Soc.Proc. 318, Boston,MA, (1993).Google Scholar
3 Bruce, R., Clarke, D. and Eicher, S., J.Electron.Mat., 19 (3), 225, (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4 Ivey, D.G., Jian, P., Wan, L., Bruce, R., Eicher, S. and Blaauw, C., J.Electron.Mat., 20, (3), 237, (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5 Wakita, A., Moll, N., Fischer-Colbrie, A. and Stickle, W., J.ApplPhys., 68 (6), 2833, (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6 Reeves, G.K. and Harrison, H.B., IEEE Elecron.Dev.Lett., 1982, EDL–3, 111, (1982).Google Scholar
7 Chen, C.L., Hollis, M.A., Mahoney, L.J., Goodhue, W.D., Manfra, M.J. and Murphy, R.A., J.Vac.Sci.Technol., B5 (4), 902, (1987).Google Scholar
8 Wang, L.C., Wang, X.Z., Hsu, S.N., Lau, S.S., Lin, P.S., Sands, T., Schwartz, S.A., Plumpton, D.L. and Kuech, T.F., J.ApplPhys., 69 (8), 4364, (1991).Google Scholar
9 Zheng, L., J.Appl.Phys., 71 (7), 1, 3566, (1992).Google Scholar