Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gq7q9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T04:44:08.867Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Optical Degradation and Morphology in a-Si:H

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

Jun-ichi Nakata ,
Atsushi Miyanishi ,
Junji Shirafuji ,
Shozo Imao ,
Keiji Fujibayashi  and
Yoshio Inuishi
Jun-ichi Nakata
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Science and Technology, Kinki University, Kowakae, Higashiosaka, Osaka 577, Japan
Atsushi Miyanishi
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Science and Technology, Kinki University, Kowakae, Higashiosaka, Osaka 577, Japan
Junji Shirafuji
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Osaka University, Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka 565, Japan
Shozo Imao
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Science and Technology, Kinki University, Kowakae, Higashiosaka, Osaka 577, Japan
Keiji Fujibayashi
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Science and Technology, Kinki University, Kowakae, Higashiosaka, Osaka 577, Japan
Yoshio Inuishi
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Science and Technology, Kinki University, Kowakae, Higashiosaka, Osaka 577, Japan
Get access

Abstract

The relationship between the optical degradation and the morphology of hydrogenated amorphous silicon (a-Si:H) films was studied through the analysis of the annealing processes. The annealing of optically induced metastable dangling bonds can be explained in terms of the first and the second order reactions with dispersive hydrogen diffusion for the films deposited at lower and higher temperature, respectively. The activation energy of the annealing was estimated to be 0.8 eV with a small distribution in both cases. Optically enhanced annealing was first observed. It was found by DLTS and CT measurements that the density of hole trap located at Ev+0.6 eV was remarkably decreased by the light soaking, accompanied by the simultaneous increase of electron trap at Ec-0.7 ∼ Ec-0.9 eV due to the dangling bonds. These experimental facts support the view that the hole trap corresponds to the weak bonds, which convert to the metastable dangling bonds by light soaking.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 149: Symposium E – Amorphous Silicon Technology - 1989 , 1989 , 607
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Staebler, D.L. and Wronski, C.R., Appl.Phys.Lett. 31, 292 (1977).Google Scholar
2. Stutzmann, M., Jackson, W.B. and Tsai, C.C., Phys.Rev. B32, 23 (1985).Google Scholar
3. Ohagi, H., Yamazaki, M., Nakata, J., Shirafuji, J., Fujibayashi, K. and Inuishi, Y., Tech. digest PVSEC-3, Tokyo, 1987, p. 671.Google Scholar
4. Ohagi, H., Yamazaki, M., Nakata, J., Imao, S., Shirafuji, J., Fujibayashi, K.and Inuishi, Y., Jpn.J.Appl.Phys. 27, L916 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Ohagi, H., Yamazaki, M., Nakata, J., Imao, S., Shirafuji, J., Fujibayashi, K. and Inuishi, Y., Appl.Surf.Sci. 33/34, 719 (1988).Google Scholar
6. Ohagi, H., Nakata, J., Miyanishi, A., Imao, S., Jeong, M., Shirafuji, J., Fujibayashi, K. and Inuishi, Y., Jpn.J.Appl.Phys. 27, L2245 (1988).Google Scholar
7. Eser, E., J.Appl.Phys. 59, 3508 (1986).Google Scholar
8. Shirafuji, J., Kuwagaki, M., Sato, T. and Inuishi, Y., Jpn.J.Appl.Phys. 23, 1278 (1984).Google Scholar
9. Shirafuji, J., Nagata, S. and Kuwagaki, M., Jpn.J.Appl.Phys. 25, 336 (1986).Google Scholar
10. Chenevas-Paule, A., Semiconductors and Semimetals (Academic Press, New York, 1984), Vol.21, Chap.12.Google Scholar
11. Wiesendanger, R., Rosenthaler, L., Hidber, H.R., Guntherodt, H.J., McKinnon, A.W. and Spear, W.E., J.Appl.Phys. 63, 4515 (1988).Google Scholar
12. Yamazaki, M., Nakata, J., Imao, S., Shirafuji, J. and Inuishi, Y., Jpn.J.Appl.Phys. 28, (4) (1989), in press.Google Scholar
13. Lee, C., Ohlsen, W.D., Taylor, P.C., Ullal, H.S. and Ceasar, G.P., Phys. Rev. B31, 100 (1985).Google Scholar
14. Smith, Z.E. and Wagner, S., Phys.Rev. B 32, 5510 (1985).Google Scholar
15. Street, R.A., Appl.Phys. Lett. 41, 1060 (1982).Google Scholar
16. Jackson, W.B., Marshall, J.M. and Moyer, M.D., Phys.Rev. B39, 1164 (1989).Google Scholar
17. Redfield, D., Appl.Phys.Lett. 49, 1517 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Stutzmann, M., Biegelsen, D.K. and Street, R.A., Phys.Rev. B35, 5666 (1987).Google Scholar
19. McMahon, T.J. and Crandall, R.S., Phys.Rev. B39, 1766 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Nitta, Y., Abe, K., Hattori, K., Okamoto, H. and Hamakawa, Y., J.Non-Cryst.Solids 97&98, 695 (1987).Google Scholar
21. Gelatos, A.V., Cohen, J.D. and Harbison, J.P., Appl.Phys.Lett. 49, 722 (1986).Google Scholar
22. Gelatos, A.V., Mahavadi, K.K., Cohen, J.D. and Harbison, J.P., Appl.Phys.Lett. 53, 403 (1988).Google Scholar
23. Lang, D.V., Cohen, J.D. and Harbison, J.P., Phys.Rev. B25, 5285 (1982).Google Scholar