Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-30T21:32:33.651Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On the Excitation Mechanism of Erbium and Ytterbium in the Quaternary Compounds InGaAsP

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

Albrecht Winnacker
Affiliation:
Institute of Materials Science 6, University of Erlangen, Germany.
Gerhard Pensl
Affiliation:
Institute of Applied Physics, University of Erlangen, Germany.
Get access

Abstract

An efficient transfer of excitonic energy to rare earth (RE) ions is crucial for possible optoelectronic applications of RE doped semiconductors. In order to investigate the energy transfer mechanism to RE ions after optical above bandgap excitation we studied the intensity of the 4I13/2 →4 4I15/2-transition of Er3+ (1.54μm) and the one of the 2F5/22F7/2 -transition of Yb3+ (lμm) (loped into InGaAsP-layers lattice matched to InP. By varying the composition of the quaternary compoun ds, the bandgap energy together with the RE bound exciton energy were tuned relative to the RE excitation energy, and the effect on the RE luminescence intensity was observed. The results can be interpreted by stating a) that the energy transfer to the RE proceeds via the RE bound exciton, and b) that the intensity of the RE luminescence is essentially determined by the rate of back transfer of the RE excitation energy ERE to the bound exciton (with excitation energy Ebe). In this back transfer the energy of the excited RE ion plus the energy of 0, 1, 2 ... L0-phonons (energy Elo) is used to reexcite the bound exciton, instead of being emitted as an RE luminescence photon. For compositions where Ebe = ERE + n. Elo (n = 0, 1, 2...) we have a maximum of back transfer and correspondingly a, minimum in RE luminescence. In between the intensity has a, maximum.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Ennen, H., Kaufmann, U., Pomrenke, G., Schneider, J., Windscheif, J., and Axmann., A. J. Cryst. Growth 64,165 (1983).Google Scholar
[2] Whitney, P.S., Uwai, K., Nakagome, H., and Takahei, K.. Appl.Phys.Lett. 53(21),2074 (1988).Google Scholar
[3] Lambert, B., LeCorre, A., Toudic, Y., Lhomer, C., Grandpierre, G., and Gauneau., M. J.Phys. Gondens.Matter. 2,479 (1990).Google Scholar
[4] Godlewski, M., Kozanecki, A., Bergman, J.P., and Monemar., B. Appl.Phys.Lett. 66(4), 493 (1995).Google Scholar
[5] Kozanecki, A. and Szczerbakow, A.. Appl.Phys.Lett. 66(26), 3630 (1995).Google Scholar
[6] Lhomer, C., Lambert, B., Toudic, Y., LeCorre, A., Gauneau, M., Clerot, F., and Sermage., B. Semic.Sci. Tec. 6,916 (1991).Google Scholar
[7] Neuhalfen, A.J. and Wessels, B.W.. Appl.Phys.Lett. 60(21), 2657 (1992);Google Scholar
[8] Taguchi, A., Takahei, K., and Horikoshi, Y.. J.Appl.Phys. 76(11),7288 (1994).Google Scholar
[9] Wellmann, P. and Winnacker, A.. submitted to J.Appl.Phys..Google Scholar
[10] Isshiki, H., Kobayashi, H., Yugo, S., Kimura, T., and Ikoma, T.. Appl.Phys.Lett. 58(5), 484 (1991).Google Scholar
[11] Chang, S.J. and Takahei, K.. Appl.Phys.Lett, 65(4), 433 (1994).Google Scholar
[12] Godlewski, M., Swiatek, K., and Monemar, B.. J.Luminescence 58,303 (1994).Google Scholar
[13] Geschwind, S., Devlin, G.E., Cohen, R.L., and Chinn, S.R.. Phys.Rev. 137(4A), A1087 (1965).Google Scholar
[14] Maat-Gersdorf, Ingrid de, Gregorkiewicz, T., Ammerlaan, C.A., and Sobolev, N.A.. Semicond. Sci. Technol. 10,666 (1995).Google Scholar