Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T22:42:13.762Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Novel three Dimensional Biodegradable Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

Kacey G. Marra ,
Phil G. Campbell ,
Paul A. Dimilla ,
Prashant N. Kumta ,
Mark P. Mooney ,
Jeffrey W. Szem  and
Lee E. Weiss
Kacey G. Marra
Affiliation:
Institute for Complex Engineered Systems, Carnegie Mellon University (CMU), Pittsburgh, PA
Phil G. Campbell
Affiliation:
Institute for Complex Engineered Systems, Carnegie Mellon University (CMU), Pittsburgh, PA
Paul A. Dimilla
Affiliation:
Chemical Engineering Dept., CMU
Prashant N. Kumta
Affiliation:
Institute for Complex Engineered Systems, Carnegie Mellon University (CMU), Pittsburgh, PA Materials Science and Eng. Dept, CMU
Mark P. Mooney
Affiliation:
University of Pittsburgh, Dept. of Anatomy & Histology, Pittsburgh, PA
Jeffrey W. Szem
Affiliation:
Div. of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA
Lee E. Weiss
Affiliation:
Institute for Complex Engineered Systems, Carnegie Mellon University (CMU), Pittsburgh, PA Robotics Institute, CMU
Get access

Abstract

We have constructed osteogenic scaffolds using solid freeform fabrication techniques. Blends of biodegradable polymers, polycaprolactone and poly(D,L-lactic-co-glycolic acid), have been examined as scaffolds for applications in bone tissue engineering. Hydroxyapatite granules were incorporated into the blends and porous discs were prepared. Mechanical properties and degradation rates of the composites were determined. The discs were seeded with rabbit bone marrow or cultured bone marrow stromal cells and in vitro studies were conducted. Electron microscopy and histological analysis revealed an osteogenic composite that supports bone cell growth not only on the surface but throughout the 1 mm thick scaffold as well. Seeded and unseeded discs were mechanically assembled in layers and implanted in a rabbit rectus abdominis muscle. Bone growth was evident after eight weeks in vivo. Electron microscopy and histological analyses indicate vascularization and primitive bone formation throughout the seeded composite, and also a “fusion” of the layers to form a single, solid construct. Finally, we have begun to incorporate the growth factor IGF-I into the scaffold to enhance osteogenicity and/or as an alternative to cell seeding.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 550: Symposium GG/HH/II – Biomedical Materials-Drug Delivery, Implants and Tissue Engr , 1998 , 155
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.) Ishuag, S. L.; Yaszemski, M. J.; Bizios, R.; Mikos, A. G., “Osteoblast function on synthetic biodegradable polymers,” J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 1994, 28, 1445–1453.Google Scholar
2.) Ishaug-Riley, S. L.; Crane, G. M.; Gurlek, A.; Miller, M. J.; Yasko, A.; Yaszemski, M. J.; Mikos, A. G., “Ectopic bone formation by marrow stromal osteoblast transplantation using poly(D,Llactic-co-glycolic acid) foams implanted into the rat mesentery,” J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 1997, 36, 1–8.Google Scholar
3.) Ishaug, S. L.; Crane, G. M.; Miller, M. J.; Yasko, A.; Yaszemski, M. J.; Mikos, A. G., “Bone formation by three-dimensional stromal osteoblast culture in biodegradable polymer scaffolds,” J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 1997, 36, 17–28.Google Scholar
4.) Attawia, M. A.; Herbert, K. M.; Laurencin, C. T., “Osteoblast-like cell adherance and migration through 3-dimensional porous polymer matrices,” Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1995, 213(2), 639–644.Google Scholar
5.) DeLeu, J.; Trueta, J., “Vasularization of bone grafts in the anterior chamber of the eye,” J. Bone Joint Surg. 1965, 47B, 319.Google Scholar
6.) Heslop, B. F.; Zeiss, I. M.; Nisbet, N. W., “Studies on transference of bone: I. Comparison of autologous and homologous implants with reference to osteocyte survival, osteogenesis, and host reaction,” Br. J. Exp. Pathol. 1960, 41, 269.Google Scholar
7.) Yaszemski, M. J.; Payne, R. G.; Hayes, W. C.; Langer, R.; Mikos, A. G., “In vitro degradation of a poly(propylene fumarate)-based composite material,” Biomater. 1996, 17(22), 2127–2130.Google Scholar
8.) Szem, J. W.; Marra, K. G.; Kumta, P. N.; Cook, L. A.; DiMilla, P. A.; Weiss, L. E. “Osteoblast adhesion and proliferation on polymer blends,” J. Biomed. Mater. Res., In Preparation.Google Scholar
9.) U.S. Patent, 1996, Mikos, A. G.; Sarakinos, G.; Vacanti, J. P.; Langer, R. S.; Cima, L. G., "Biocompatible polymer membranes and methods of preparation of three dimensional membrane structures,” 5,514,378.Google Scholar
10.) Marra, K.G.; Szem, J.W.; Kumta, P.N.; DiMilla, P.A.; Weiss, L.E.; “In Vitro Analysis of Biodegradable Polymer Blend/Hydroxyapatite Composites for Bone Tissue Engineering,” J. Biomed. Mat. Res. Submitted 7/98.Google Scholar