Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T12:36:37.496Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Novel Approach for The Production of Low Dislocation Relaxed Sige Material.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

A.R. Powell
Affiliation:
IBM, T.J.Watson Research Center, PO Box 218, Yorktown Heights, NY 10598
S.S. Iyer
Affiliation:
IBM, T.J.Watson Research Center, PO Box 218, Yorktown Heights, NY 10598
F.K. Legoues
Affiliation:
IBM, T.J.Watson Research Center, PO Box 218, Yorktown Heights, NY 10598
Get access

Abstract

In this growth process a new strain relief mechanism operates, whereby the SiGe epitaxial layer relaxes without the generation of threading dislocations within the SiGe layer. This is achieved by depositing SiGe on an ultrathin Silicon On Insulator, SOl, substrate with a superficial silicon thickness less than the SiGe layer thickness. Initially, the thin Si layer is put under tension due to an equalization of the strain between the Si and SiGe layers. Thereafter, the strain created in the thin Si layer relaxes by plastic deformation. Since the dislocations are formed and glide in the thin Si layer, no threading dislocation is ever introduced into the upper SiGe material, which appeared dislocation free to the limit of the cross sectional Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) analysis. We thus have a method for producing very low dislocation, relaxed SiGe films with the additional benefit of an SO substrate. This buffer structure is significantly less than a micrometer in thickness and offers distinct advantages over the thick SiGe buffer layers presently in use.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Abstreiter, G., Brugger, H., Wolf, T., Jorke, H. and Herzog, H.J., Phys Rev. Lett. 54 2441 (1985).Google Scholar
2 Schaffler, F., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc 220 433 (1991).Google Scholar
3 Ismail, K., Meyerson, B.S., and Wang, P.J., Appl. Phys. Lett 58 2117 (1991).Google Scholar
4 Mii, Y.J., Xie, Y.H., Fitzgerald, E.A., Monroe, D., Thiel, F.A., Weir, B.E., and Feldman, L.C., Appl. Phys. Lett 59 1611 (1991).Google Scholar
5 Jain, S.C., and Hayes, W., Semicond. Sci. Technol. 6 547 (1991).Google Scholar
6 Powell, A.R., Kubiak, R.A., WhalI, T.E., Parker, E.H.C., and Bowen, D.K., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc 220 277 (1991).Google Scholar
7 Mathews, J.W., in Epitaxial Growth, part B, (Academic Press, New York), ed Mathews, J.W. pp559 (1975).Google Scholar
8 Powell, A.R., Eberl, K., LeGoues, F.K., Ek, B.A., and Iyer, S.S., J.Vac. Sci. Technol. B 11 1064 (1993)Google Scholar
9 lyer, S.S., Pitner, P.M., Tejwani, M.J., and Sedgwick, T.O., to be published in Proc of 3rd International conf. on wafer bonding technology (1993).Google Scholar