Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-sh8wx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-22T01:02:50.759Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A New Type of Cation-Conducting Rubbery Solid Electrolyte: The Ionic Rubber

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

C. A. Angell
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Arizona State University Tempe, AZ 85287–1604
Changle Liu
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Arizona State University Tempe, AZ 85287–1604
E. Sanchez
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Arizona State University Tempe, AZ 85287–1604
Get access

Abstract

We show that the conductivity maximum, well known for salt-in-polymer electrolytes is not the maximum conductivity in the system when the salts used are chosen for their resistance to crystallization at high concentration. The polymer + salt system, with increasing salt content, goes through a transition zone characterized by a maximum in glass transition temperature. Beyond this point additional salt serves to plasticize the salt-crosslinked polymer system, establishing thereby a region of increasing conductivity in which the conductivity can reach very large values. We show that “polymer in-salt” solutions constitute a new type of rubbery solid electrolyte in which the conductivity is dominated by cation motion. Such systems are true hybrids of the previously distinct “superionic glass” and “polymer electrolyte” types of amorphous solid conductors.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Armand, M. B., Chabagno, J. M. and Duclot, M. J., in Fast Ion Transport in Solids Eds. Vashista, P. Mundy, J.N. and Shenoy, G. K. (Elsevier, North Holland, Amsterdam, 1979).Google Scholar
2. Shriver, D. F., Papke, B. L., Ratner, M. A., Dupon, R., Wong, T. and Brodwin, M. Solid State Ionics 5, 83 (1981).Google Scholar
3. Cowie, J.M.G. and Cree, S.H. Ann. Rev. Phys. Chem., 40, 85, (1989).Google Scholar
4. (a) Koksbang, R., Olsen, I.I., Tender, P.E., Knudsen, N., Lundsgaard, J.S., and Yde-Andersen, S. J. Power Sources 32, 175 (1990). (b) Skaarup, S., West, K., Yde-Andersen, S. and Koksbang, R. in Recent Advances in Fast Ion Conducting Materis and Devices, Eds. B. V. R. Chowdari, Q.-G. Liu and L. -Q. Chen (World Scientific: Singapore, 1990), p. 83.Google Scholar
5. Huq, R., Koksbang, R., Tender, P. E. and Farrington, G. C. Ibid p. 63.Google Scholar
6. Steele, B.C.H. Mat. Sci. & Eng. B. Solid State 13, 79 (1992).Google Scholar
7. (a) McLin, M.G. and Angell, C.A. Solid State Ionics, 53–56, 1027 (1992). (b) McLin, M.G. and Angell, C.A. J. Phys. Chem., 95, 9464 (1991).Google Scholar
8. (a) Angell, C.A. Solid State Ionics, 9&10, 3 (1983). (b) Angell, C.A. Ann. Rev. Phys. Chem., 43, 693 (1992).Google Scholar
9. Berry, G.C. and Fox, T. J. Adv. Polymer Sci., 5, 261 (1968).Google Scholar
10. Liu, C. and Angell, C.A. J. Chem. Phys. (in press).Google Scholar
11. Mercier, R., Malugani, J.-P., Fays, B., and Robert, G. Solid State Ionics 5, 663 (1981).Google Scholar
12. see Sundheim, B.R. in “Molten Salts,” Pergammon, N.Y. (1962); J. Phys. Chem., 60, 1381 (1956).Google Scholar
13. Shao, J. and Angell, C.A. Solid State Ionics, (to be submitted).Google Scholar
14. Sanchez, E. and Angell, C.A. (to be published).Google Scholar
15. Tatsumisago, M., Angell, C.A., and Martin, S.W. J. Chem. Phys., 97, 6968 (1992).Google Scholar
16. Fan, J., Marzke, R. L., and Angell, C. A. (this volume).Google Scholar
17. Xu, K. and Angell, C.A. (to be published).Google Scholar
18. Webber, A., J. Electrochem. Soc., 138, 9 (1991); imide is N(CF3SO2)2-Google Scholar
19.Jacopetti, 1942 in Timmermans, J. Physico-Chemical Constants of Binary Systems, Vol. 3.Google Scholar
20. Mercier, R., Malugani, J.-P., Fays, B., Robert, G. Solid State Ion., 5, 663 (1981).Google Scholar