Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-12T06:29:02.525Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Neutron and X-Ray Scattering Studies of (FeF2) M (CoF2)n Multilayers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 September 2012

D. Lederman
Affiliation:
Dept. of Physics, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093–0319 Dept. of Physics, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106
D. P. Belanger
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95064
J. Wang
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95064
S-J. Han
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95064
C. Paduani
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95064 Department of Physics, Univ. Fed. de Santa Catarina, Florianopolis, Brazil
C. A. Ramos
Affiliation:
Dept. of Physics, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 Centro AtòMico Bariloche, 8400 Bariloche, Rio Negro, Argentina
R. M. Nicklow
Affiliation:
Solid State Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge TN 37831
Get access

Abstract

We have performed elastic neutron scattering measurements of the staggered magnetization in (FeF2) M (CoF2) n superlattices. Thermal expansion Measurements, which are proportional to the magnetic contribution to the specific heat, were also carried out using high resolution x-ray diffraction. One of the two measured samples has thicknesses of M = n = 4.5 and the other M = 26 and n = 28 Monolayers, as determined from high angle x-ray θ — 2θ scans. In the M = n = 4.5 sample, only one transition is observed at T/v = 62.9K. Analysis of the neutron data, including the rounding effects, indicates an effective β ≈ 0.42. This does not compare well with the 3D Ising exponent β = 0.325. The X-ray data also show the existence of only one specific heat anomaly at T = 62.8 K. For the M = 26, n = 28 sample, dips in the staggered magnetization and peaks in the thermal expansion were observed at T ≈ 40 K and 74 K. The higher temperature anomaly, associated primarily with the FeF2 layers, is sharper than the lower one, which is presumably rounded by the staggered ordering field imposed by the long range order in the FeF2 regions on the CoF2 regions.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Belanger, D. P., Lui, M., and Erwin, R. W., these proceedings.Google Scholar
2. Ramos, C. A., Lederman, D., King, A. R., and Jaccarino, V., Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 2913 (1990).Google Scholar
3. Lederman, D., P.h.D. Thesis, University of California, Santa Barbara, unpublished (1992).Google Scholar
4. Lederman, D., Ramos, C. A., Jaccarino, V., and Cardy, J. L., to be published.Google Scholar
5. Lederman, D., Ramos, C. A., and Jaccarino, V., presented at the Seventh Latin-American Symposium on Surface Physics, Bariloche, Argentina, 1992 (to be published).Google Scholar
6. For work done on antiferromagnetic oxides, see, for example, Carey, M. J., Spada, F. E., Berkowitz, A. E., Cao, W., and Thomas, G., J. Mater. Res. 6, 2680 (1991) andGoogle Scholar
Borchers, J. A., Carey, M. J., Erwin, R. W., Majkrzak, C. F., and Berkowitz, A. E., Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 1878 (1993).Google Scholar
7. Cowiey, R. A., Buyers, W. J. L., Martel, P., and Stevenson, R. W. H., J. Phys. C 6, 2997 (1973).Google Scholar
8. Hutchings, M. T., Rainford, B. D. and Guggenheim, H. J., J. Phys. C 3, 307 (1970).Google Scholar
9. Nash, A. E., Ramos, C. A., and Jaccarino, V., Phys. Rev. B 47, 5805 (1993).Google Scholar
10. For a review, see Jaccarino, V., King, A. R., Lederman, D., Lui, M., and Ramos, C. A. in Heteroepitaxy of Dissimilar Materials, edited by Farrow, R. F. C., Harbison, J. P., Peercy, P. S., and Zangwill, A. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 221, Pittsburgh, PA, 1991) pp. 314.Google Scholar
11. Viani, M. B., Belanger, D. P. and Lederman, D., unpublished.Google Scholar
12. For theoretical calculations based on mean field Models, see Carrico, A. S. and Camley, R. E., Phys. Rev. B 45, 13117 (1992) andGoogle Scholar
Wang, R. W. and Mills, D. L., Phys. Rev. B 46, 11681 (1992).Google Scholar