Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-n9wrp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T16:54:05.467Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Nanometer Scale Structures Resulting from Graphite Oxidation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

Marilyn J. Nowakowski ,
John M. Vohs  and
Dawn A. Bonnell
Marilyn J. Nowakowski
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104
John M. Vohs
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104
Dawn A. Bonnell
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104
Get access

Abstract

Scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) and spectroscopy (STS) were used to characterize highly oriented pyrolytic graphite (HOPG) which was oxidized by two different methods, furnace heating in atmosphere and immersion in oxygen plasma. The character of the surfaces was found to be dissimilar on a micron scale but comparable on a nanometer scale, at which both appear to be comprised of sharp step edges. Variations in local electronic structure near a step edge were compared.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 332: Symposium U – Determining Nanoscale Physical Properties of Materials by Microscopy and Spectroscopy , 1994 , 519
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Yang, R. T., in Chemistry and Physics of Carbon, edited by Walker, P. L. Jr., and Thrower, P. A., Vol. 19 (Marcel Dekker, New York, 1984), pp.163–210.Google Scholar
2. Hennig, G. R., in Chemistry and Physics of Carbon, edited by Walker, P. L. Jr., Vol. 2 (Marcel Dekker, New York, 1966), pp. 1–50.Google Scholar
3. Hennig, G. R., J. Chem. Phys. 40, 2877 (1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Chu, X. and Schmidt, L. D., Surf. Sci. 268, 325 (1992); Carbon 29 (8), 1251 (1991).Google Scholar
5. Chang, H. and Bard, L. J., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 112, 4598 (1990); J. Am. Chem. Soc. 113, 5588 (1991).Google Scholar
6. Nowakowski, M. J., Vohs, J. M., and Bonnell, D. A., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 76 (2), 279 (1993).Google Scholar
7. Atamny, F., Schlogl, R., Wirth, W. J., and Stephan, J., Ultramicroscopy 42–44, 660 (1992).Google Scholar