Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-rnpqb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-01T17:27:02.331Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Multi-Site, Neurotransmitter-Based Retinal Interface

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

Mark C. Peterman
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Physics, Stanford, CA
Harvey A. Fishman
Affiliation:
Department of Ophthalmology, Stanford, CA
Get access

Abstract

Nearly all retinal prosthetics have focused on electrical stimulation of the nervous system. We are developing a novel prosthetic interface for the retina based on neurotransmitter delivery. In the past, we have demonstrated the ability to stimulate individual rat pheochromacytoma cells (PC12 cell line) using microfluidic delivery through micron-sized apertures. This delivery was highly reproducible, very controllable, and quantifiable. But this early stage device was limited to a single stimulation site and crude microfluidics. Here, we present the next stage in microfluidic retinal prosthetics with a multi-stimulation site device that incorporates more advanced control over the microfluidic delivery. We created an array of apertures in a thin silicon nitride membrane, to which we can deliver neurotransmitters in an addressable manner. Excitable cells (PC12) are seeded on the device and imaged using Ca2+-sensitive dyes with a confocal microscope. We can then excite the cells at an array of multiple precise locations near the apertures, demonstrating the next step in neurotransmitter-based retinal prosthetics.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Masland, R. H., “The Fundamental Plan of the Retina,” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 4, pp. 877886, 2001.Google Scholar
[2] Humayun, M. S., “Intraocular Retinal Prosthesis,” Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society, vol. 99, pp. 271300, 2001.Google Scholar
[3] Chow, A. Y., Pardue, M. T., Chow, V. Y., Peyman, G. A., Liang, C. P., Perlman, J. I., and Peachey, N. S., “Implantation of Silicon Chip Microphotodiode Arrays into the Cat Subretinal Space,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, vol. 9, pp. 8695, 2001.Google Scholar
[4] Rizzo, J. F., Wyatt, J., Humayun, M., E. de Juan, Liu, W. T., Chow, A., Eckmiller, R., Zrenner, E., Yagi, T., and Abrams, G., “Retinal Prosthesis: An Encouraging First Decade with Major Challenges Ahead,” Ophthalmology, vol. 108, pp. 1314, 2001.Google Scholar
[5] Zrenner, E., “Will Retinal Implants Restore Vision?,” Science, vol. 295, pp. 10221025, 2002.Google Scholar
[6] Peterman, M. C., Lee, C., Leng, T., Huie, P., and Fishman, H. A., “Novel Interface to Biological Systems for Retinal Prosthetics,” Materials Research Society Symposium – Proceedings, vol. 729, pp. 149154, 2002.Google Scholar
[7] Peterman, M. C., Bloom, D. M., Lee, C., Bent, S. F., Marmor, M. F., Blumenkranz, M. S., and Fishman, H. A., “Localized Neurotransmitter Release for Use in a Prototype Retinal Interface,” Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, pp. in press, 2003.Google Scholar
[8] Burgreen, D. and Nakache, F., “Efficiency of Pumping and Power Generation in Ultrafine Electrokinetic Systems,” Journal of Applied Mechanics, vol. 32, pp. 675-&, 1965.Google Scholar
[9] Peterman, M. C., Ziebarth, J. M., Braha, O., Bayley, H., Fishman, H. A., and Bloom, D. M., “Ion Channels and Lipid Bilayer Membranes under High Potentials Using Microfabricated Apertures,” Biomedical Microdevices, vol. 4, pp. 231236, 2002.Google Scholar
[10] Burgreen, D. and Nakache, F., “Electrokinetic Flow in Ultrafine Capillary Slits,” Journal of Physical Chemistry, vol. 68, pp. 1084-&, 1964.Google Scholar