Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T04:23:17.200Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Monte Carlo Simulations of Crystalline TATB

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

Thomas D. Sewell*
Affiliation:
Theoretical Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545
Get access

Abstract

We are performing constant-NPT Monte Carlo calculations of the physical properties of crystalline TATB. Our approach is to employ an atomistic model in which the individual molecules are treated as semi-rigid entities. Each molecule is allowed to undergo rigid translations and rotations, and in some cases limited intramolecular flexibility is conferred on the molecules via exocyclic torsions. Additionally, the size and shape of the simulation box is allowed to vary. Our immediate interest is in computing the density, lattice energy, lattice constants, and other structural parameters as a function of temperature. Preliminary results indicate that simulations involving only two molecules suffice for calculations of the energy and density, but that more molecules are required to compute the lattice constants. Intramolecular flexibility is important, particularly at higher temperatures.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Yashonath, S., Price, S. L., and McDonald, I. R., Mol. Phys. 64, 361 (1988).Google Scholar
2. Sewell, T. D., Monte Carlo Simulations of Crystalline Benzene (manuscript in preparation).Google Scholar
3. Kalos, M. H. and Whitlock, P. A., Monte Carlo Methods. Volume I: Basics (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1986).Google Scholar
4. Hald, A., Statistical Theory with Engineering Applications (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1952), Ch. 13.Google Scholar
5. Williams, D. E. and Cox, S. R., Acta Cryst. B 40, 404 (1984).Google Scholar
6. Ritchie, J. P. and Copenhaver, A. S., J. Comp. Chem. 16,777 (1995).Google Scholar
7. Gaussian 92/DFT, Revision G.1, Frisch, M. J., Trucks, G. W., Schlegel, H. B., Gill, P. M. W., Johnson, B. G., Wong, M. W., Foresman, J. B., Robb, M. A., Head-Gordon, M., Replogle, E. S., Gomperts, R., Andres, J. L., Raghavachari, K., Binkley, J. S., Gonzalez, C., Martin, R. L., Fox, D. J., Defrees, D. J., Baker, J., Stewart, J. J. P., and Pople, J. A., Gaussian, Inc., Pittsburgh PA, 1993.Google Scholar
8. Cady, H. H. and Larson, A. C., Acta Cryst. 18,485 (1965).Google Scholar