Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Molecular Modeling of Free Volume Distributions of Amorphous Membrane Polymers

  • Dieter Hofmann (a1), Matthias Heuchel (a1), Yuri Yampolskii (a2) and A. V. Topchiev (a2)

Abstract

The paper deals with important differences in the distribution of free volume in high and low free volume polymers as indicated by a joint investigation utilizing molecular modeling and positron annihilation lifetime (PALS) studies. The main focus of this paper is on the molecular modeling approach. The first set of polymers in question are the ultra-high free volume polymer poly(1–(trimethylsilyl)-1-propyne) (PTMSP) and two polystyrene derivatives containing Si and F. Extended equilibration procedures were necessary to obtain reasonable packing models for the polymers. The transition state Gusev-Suter Monte Carlo method was utilized to prove a reasonable agreement between simulated and measured diffusivity and solubility values for the model structures. The free volume distribution was analyzed for the validated packing models and compared with respective PALS data. In both cases a bimodal distribution of free volume was observed for PTMSP while the polystyrene derivatives as other conventional glassy polymers showed a more or less monomodal behavior. Good qualitative agreement is demonstrated between size distributions of free volume elements in these polymers obtained via molecular computer modeling and PALS experiments. In addition a series of conventional and high performance polyimides was considered. There a major result is that polyimides with conventional permeabilities for small molecules always show just a monomodal distribution of free volume element sizes in the radius range up to about 5 Å, while all polyimides with high permeabilities have a wider, often bimodal, distribution extending up to a radius between 6 and about 8 Å.

Copyright

References

Hide All
1. Nagai, K., K., , Masuda, T., Nakagawa, T., Freeman, B. D., Pinnau, I., Progress in Polymer Science 26, 721 (2001).
2. Yampolskii, Yu. P., Korikov, A. P., Shantarovich, V. P., Nagai, K, Freeman, B. D., Masuda, T., Teraguchi, M., Kwak, G., Macromolecules 34, 1788 (2001).
3. Nagel, C., Schmidtke, E., Günther-Schade, K., Hofmann, D., Fritsch, D., Strunskus, T., and Faupel, F., Macromolecules 33, 2242 (2000).
4. Hofmann, D., Heuchel, M., Yampolskii, Yu., Khotimskii, V., and Shantarovich, V., Macromolecules 35, 2129 (2002).
5. Heuchel, M., and Hofmann, D., Desalination 144, 67 (2002).
6. Polymer User Guide, amorphous Cell Section, version 4.0.0, Molecular Simulations, San Diego, 1996
7. Hofmann, D., Fritz, L., Ulbrich, J., Schepers, C., and Böhning, M., Macromol. Theory Simul. 9, 293 (2000).
8. Sun, H., and Rigby, D., Spectrochimica Acta, 53A, 1301 (1997).
9. Rigby, D., Sun, H., and Eichinger, B.E., Polymer International 44, 311 (1997).
10. Bohlen, J., Wolff, J., and Kirchheim, R., Macromolecules, 32, 3766 (1999).

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed