Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T01:00:32.893Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Molecular Dynamics Simulation of Confined Glass Forming Liquids

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2011

Fathollah Varnikl
Affiliation:
Institut für Physik, Johannes Gutenberg-Universitäat, Staudinger Weg 7, D–55099 Mainz, Germany
Peter Scheidlerl
Affiliation:
Institut für Physik, Johannes Gutenberg-Universitäat, Staudinger Weg 7, D–55099 Mainz, Germany
Jörg Baschnagel
Affiliation:
Institut Charles Sadron, ULP, 67083 Strasbourg, France
Walter Kob
Affiliation:
Laboratoire des Verres, Université Montpellier II, 34000 Montpellier, France
Kurt Binder
Affiliation:
Institut für Physik, Johannes Gutenberg-Universitäat, Staudinger Weg 7, D–55099 Mainz, Germany
Get access

Abstract

Two model studies are presented in order to elucidate the effect of confinement on glass forming fluids, attempting to study the effects of the interactions between the confining walls and the fluid particles. In the first model, short bead-spring chains (modelling a melt of flexible polymers) are put in between perfectly flat, structureless walls, on which repulsive potentials act. It is shown that chains near the walls move faster (in the direction parallel to the walls) than chains in the bulk. A significant decrease of the (mode-coupling) critical temperature with decreasing film thickness is found. In the second model, a binary Lennard-Jones liquid is confined in a thin film, whose surface has an amorphous structure similar to the liquid. Although, as expected, the static structural properties of the liquid are not affected by the confinement, relaxation times near the wall are much larger than in the bulk. Consequences for the interpretation of experiments are briefly discussed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Donth, E., Relaxation and Thermodynamics of Polymers: Glass Transition (Akademie-Verlag, Berlin, 1992).Google Scholar
[2] Keddie, J.-L., Jones, R. A. L., and Cory, R. A., Europhys. Lett. 27, 59 (1994).Google Scholar
[3] Forrest, J. A and Jones, R. A. L. in pp. 251294 of Polymer Surfaces, Interfaces and Thin Films, Ed. Karim, A. and Kumar, S. (World Scientific, Singapore, 2000).Google Scholar
[4] Proceedings of the International Workshop on Dynamics in Confinement, J. Phys. IV France 10 (2000).Google Scholar
[5] Forrest, J. A and Dalnoki-Veress, K., The Glass Transition in Thin Polymer Films (preprint).Google Scholar
[6] Binder, K., Ferroelectrics 73, 43 (1987).Google Scholar
[7] Gennes, P. G. de, Eur. Phys. J. E 2, 201 (2000).Google Scholar
[8] Kreer, T., Baschnagel, J., Müller, M., and Binder, K., Macromolecules (2001, in press), and references therein.Google Scholar
[9] Binder, K., Baschnagel, J., Bennemann, C., and Paul, W., J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 11, A47 (1999).Google Scholar
[10] Varnik, F., Baschnagel, J., and Binder, K., J. Chem. Phys. 113, 4444 (2000), and in Ref.[4].Google Scholar
[11] Bennemann, C., Paul, W., Binder, K., and Dünweg, B., Phys. Rev. E 57, 843 (1998).Google Scholar
[12] Varnik, F., Dissertation, University of Mainz, Germany, Decembre 2000 Google Scholar
[13] Götze, W. and Sjögren, J., Rep. Progr. Phys. 55, 241 (1992).Google Scholar
[14] Schüller, J., Mel'nichenko, Yu. B., Richert, R., and Fischer, E. W., Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 2224 (1994).Google Scholar
[15] Scheidler, P., Kob, W., and Binder, K., Europhys. Lett. 52, 277 (2000), and in Ref.[4].Google Scholar
[16] Kob, W., J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 11, R85 (1999), and references. therein.Google Scholar