Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-5wvtr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T16:47:00.304Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Modeling Element Concentrations in Äspö Groundwaters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2011

Allan T. Emrén*
Affiliation:
Nuclear Chemistry, Chalmers Univ.of Technology, Göteborg, Sweden
Get access

Abstract

The chemical properties of groundwater entering a repository for nuclear wastes, have a major impact on the performance of natural and engineered barriers. Thus, accurate models for the chemical evolution of the groundwater are important in connection with performance assessments. Simple mixing of waters is inadequate for describing most chemical properties, like concentrations of iron, pH or redox potential.

In the present work, ground waters from Äspö at the Swedish east coast have been modeled. In the model it is assumed that ancient waters (end member waters) have been able to reach a steady state with respect to the minerals in the fracture walls. Due to groundwater flow, end member waters have been mixed to form intermediate waters. In the sampling process (by pumping), waters from a large number of small units are mixed too rapidly for mineral reactions to be of importance. After the sampling mixture has been formed, the water reaches equilibrium with respect to homogeneous reactions (in the aqueous phase) but not with respect to heterogeneous reactions.

The CRACKER program has been used to simulate groundwater formation and sampling process according to the model. It has been found that the end member waters are fairly stable with respect to observed mineral sets.

Conservative elements like Cl have been used to find the initial mixing ratios for intermediate waters. Evolution of the mixtures was simulated and finally mixing and speciation of waters from some 900 locations have been simulated to describe the final solution. It is found that the model is able to give a good agreement between observed and modeled concentrations for the ten most important elements as well as pH and redox potential.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Smellie, J., and Laaksoharju, M., “The Äspö Hard Rock Laboratory: Final evaluation of the hydrogeochemical pre-invevestigations in relation to existing geologic and hydraulic conditions”, SKB TR 92–31, 239 pp (1992)Google Scholar
2. Glynn, P., and Voss, C., “Geochemical characterization of Simpevarp ground waters near the Äspö Hard Rock Laboratory (SITE 94)”, SKI Report 96:18, 64 pp (1996)Google Scholar
3. Emrén, A. T., “CRACKER a Program Coupling Inhomogeneous Chemistry and Transport”, Computers & Geosciences 24, 753763 (1998)Google Scholar
4. Bond, K. A., Moreton, A. D., and Heath, T. G., “HATCHES 5.0 - The HARWELL/NIREX Database“, Harwell Laboratory (1992)Google Scholar
5. Wikberg, P., Gustafson, G., Rhén, I., and Stanfors, R., “Äspö Hard Rock Laboratory, Evaluation and conceptual modelling based on pre-investigations 1986–1990”, SKB TR 91–22, 213 pp (1991)Google Scholar
6. Tullberg, E-L., Wallin, B., and Landström, O., “Hydrogeochemical studies of fracture minerals from water conducting fractures and deep groundwaters at Äspö”, SKB Progress Report 25–90–01 84 pp (1991)Google Scholar
7. Tullberg, E-L., Private communication.Google Scholar