Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qs9v7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T05:46:01.067Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Microwave Absorption of Magnetic Antidot Arrays

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 April 2019

Leszek M. Malkinski
Affiliation:
Advanced Materials Research Institute, University of New Orleans, New Orleans, LA, USA
Minghui Yu
Affiliation:
Advanced Materials Research Institute, University of New Orleans, New Orleans, LA, USA
Donald Scherer II
Affiliation:
Advanced Materials Research Institute, University of New Orleans, New Orleans, LA, USA
Get access

Abstract

Three antidot arrays with FeNi alloy thickness of 20, 50 and 100 nm have been patterned using magnetron sputtering followed by the electron-beam lithography and lift-off technique. Ferromagnetic resonance technique was used to study dynamic properties of the antidot arrays. These results were compared with the measurements of continuous films with the same composition and thickness. Two distinct resonant fields have been observed for the bias field aligned with the edges of the square holes. Resonance peaks shifted towards each other and eventually merged when the in-plane bias field was rotated towards diagonal of the squares. This dependence has been explained in terms of magnetostatic energy associated with the square holes. The magnitude of this effect was decreasing for the arrays with the reduced thickness. The perpendicular and lateral quantized standing spin wave modes were detected in the reference films and the antidot arrays due to the perpendicular and lateral dimensional confinements.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Heyderman, L. J., Nolting, F., Backes, D., Czekaj, S., Lopez-Diaz, L., Klaui, M., Rudiger, U., Vaz, C. A. F., Bland, J. A. C., Matelon, R. J., Volkmann, U. G., and Fischer, P., Phys. Rev. B 73, 214429 (2006).Google Scholar
2. Wang, C. C., Adeyeye, A. O., and Singh, N., Nanotechnology, 17, 1629 (2006).Google Scholar
3. Torres, L., Lopez-Diaz, L., and Alejos, O., J. Appl. Phys. 87, 5645 (2000).Google Scholar
4. Wang, C. C., Adeyeye, A. O., Singh, N., Huang, Y. S., and Wu, Y. H., Phys. Rev. B 72, 174426 (2005).Google Scholar
5. Adeyeye, A. O., Bland, J. A. C., and Daboo, C., Appl. Phys. Lett. 70, 3164 (1997).Google Scholar
6. Yu, C. T., Pechan, M. J., and Mankey, G. J., Appl. Phys. Lett. 83, 3948 (2003).Google Scholar
7. Yu, C. T., Pechan, M. J., Burgei, W. A., and Mankey, G. J., J. Appl. Phys. 95, 6648 (2004).Google Scholar
8. Zhu, J. G., Fang, H., IEEE Trans. Magn. 34, 1609 (1998).Google Scholar
9. Cowburn, R. P., Adeyeye, A. O., and Bland, J. A. C., Appl. Phys. Lett. 70, 2309 (1997).Google Scholar
10. Yu, M. H., Malkinski, L., Spinu, L., Zhou, W. L., and Whittenburg, S., J. Appl. Phys. 101, 09F501 (2007)Google Scholar
11. Pechan, M. J., Yu, C. T., Compton, R. L., Park, J. P., and Crowell, P. A., J. Appl. Phys. 97, 10J903 (2005).Google Scholar
12. Nisenoff, M., and Terhune, R. W., J. Appl. Phys. 36, 732 (1965).Google Scholar
13. Prados, C., Pina, E., Hernando, A., and Montone, A., J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 14, 10063 (2002)Google Scholar