Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pjpqr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-25T04:22:02.971Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Microstructure Evolution Across Interfaces of Heterogeneous Metal Systems Under Ultrasonic Impact

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Youhong Li ,
Yinon Ashkenazy  and
Robert S. Averback
Youhong Li
Affiliation:
Computational Science and Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1304 W. Springfield Av. Urbana, IL 61801, USA.
Yinon Ashkenazy
Affiliation:
Racah Institute of Physics, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel.
Robert S. Averback
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1304 W. Green St. Urbana, IL 61801, USA.
Get access

Abstract

Large-scale Molecular Dynamics (MD) studies on heterogeneous, model metal systems subjected to intense shock loading by a flyer plate were carried out. Of interest here is the effect of structural defects on interfacial strength under these extreme conditions. The metal target and flyer were essentially single crystals of Cu, but an interface layer was created by varying the mass of the Cu atoms in part of the sample. Interfacial defects in the form of vacancies, and at different concentrations, were introduced into the interfacial region. In addition to microstructural evolution of damage in this system, the shock induced temperature and pressure changes were also analyzed.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 854: Symposium U – Stability of Thin Films and Nanostructures , 2004 , U11.2
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Olavarrieta, L. D., IEEE Circuits and Devices Magazine, 20, 5 (2004).Google Scholar
2. Reynolds, J. G., Hart, B. R., JOM, 56, 36 (2004).Google Scholar
3. Holian, B. L.. Shock Waves 5, 149 (1995).Google Scholar
4. Holian, B. L., Shock Waves 13, 489 (2004).Google Scholar
5. Germann, T.C., Holian, B.L., Lomdahl, P.S., Phys. Rev. Lett., 84 (2000) 5351;Google Scholar
Tanguy, D., Mareschal, M., Lomdahl, P. S., Germann, T. C., Holian, B. L., and Ravelo, R. Phys. Rev. B 68, 144111 (2003)Google Scholar
6. Hatano, T., Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 015503 (2004)Google Scholar
7. Rudd, R. E., Belak, J., Comp. Mater. Sci. 24 (2002) 148.Google Scholar
Marian, J., Knap, J., Ortiz, M., Phys. Rev. Lett., 93 (2004) 165503.Google Scholar
8. Asheknazy, Y., Averback, R.S., Applied Physics Letters, accepted for publication (2004).Google Scholar
9. Cleri, F. and Rosato, V., Phys. Rev. B 48, 22 (1993).Google Scholar
10. Meyers, M. A., Dynamic behavior of materials (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1994)Google Scholar
11. Zhu, H. and Averback, R.S., Philosophical Magazine A 71, 735 (1995).Google Scholar
12. Allen, M.P. and Tildesley, D. J., Computer Simulations of Liquids (Oxford University Press, oxford, 1987).Google Scholar
13. Jeong, J., Lee, I., and Chang, K. J., Phys. Rev. B 59, 329 (1999).Google Scholar
14. Tsai, D. H., J. Chem. Phys. 95, 7497 (1991).Google Scholar
15. Phillips, L., J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 7, 7813 (1995).Google Scholar
16. Holian, B. L., Germann, T. C., Maillet, J., and White, C. T., Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 285501 (2002);Google Scholar
Holian, B. L., Germann, T. C., Maillet, J., and White, C. T., Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 069902 (2003).Google Scholar
17. Holian, B. L. and Lomdahl, P. S., Science 280, 2085 (1998).Google Scholar
18. Seppälä, E. T., Belak, J., and Rudd, R. E., Phys. Rev. B 69, 134101 (2004).Google Scholar