Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-17T17:24:37.309Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Microstructure as A Tool for Proportioning High-Strength Concrete Mixes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2011

Weston T. Hester*
Affiliation:
University of California, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Berkeley, California 94720
Get access

Abstract

Until relatively recently, concrete mix materials were selected and proportioned on the basis of certain general principles established through empirical tests, past experience with similar materials, and published tables. Increasingly, however, wc. need to produce high-strength concretes with what has been considered sub-optimal or even marginal quality materials. And, whereas in the past we could afford to achieve high strengths at age 28 or 56 days, there is much greater emphasis now on achieving strengths in excess of 8,000 psi in 24 hours or less.

In response to these new demands for high-strength concretes, the concrete industry is setting aside many of the traditional methods for selecting and proportioning materials. Now, mix materials are selected deliberately for the characterisitics of their microstructure (e.g., the mineralogy and particularly crystal structure of the aggregates), and are proportioned to optimize the microstructure of the concrete.

In this paper the author illustrates how the characteristics of a material's microstructure are used as tools in selecting and proportioning mix materials. The significance of the microstructure of the aggregate particles, mortar-aggregate interface, and mortar are discussed in detail.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Alexanderson, J., “Strength Losses in Heat Cured Concrete,” Handlingar (Proceedings), No. 43 (Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden, 1972).Google Scholar
2. Blick, R.L., Petersen, C.F. and Winter, M.E., Proportioning Concrete Mixes ACI (1974), pp. 141163.Google Scholar
3. Brooks, J.J., and Wainwright, P.J., Magazine -of Concrete Research, No. 125 (1983), pp. 205213.10.1680/macr.1983.35.125.205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Carrasquillo, R.L., and Slate, F.O., Cement, Concrete, and Aggregates, CCNADP Vol.5, No. 1 (1983), pp. 5461.Google Scholar
5. Patten, B.J.F., Civil Engineering Trans., The Inst. of Engineers, Australia (1973), pp. 5862.Google Scholar
6. Ramachandran, V.S., Beaudoin, J.J. and Feldman, R.F., Concrete Science - Treatise on Current Research (Heyden & Son Ltd., London, England, 1981).Google Scholar