Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8kt4b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-30T20:24:00.514Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Microstructural Investigation of the TiSi2/Si (111) Interface

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

A. Catana
Affiliation:
Institute of Applied Physics, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
M. Heintze
Affiliation:
Institute of Applied Physics, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
P.E. Schmid
Affiliation:
Institute of Applied Physics, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
P. Stadelmann
Affiliation:
Institute of Applied Physics, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
F. Levy
Affiliation:
Institute of Applied Physics, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
Get access

Abstract

HREM was used to investigate the microstructure and bonding configuration at the interface between TiSi2 and Si (111). The interpretation of the micrographs requires extensive image calculations which were carried out for the first time on this very complex silicide/silicon system. Four different interface models are presented and the corresponding computed interface images are compared with the experimental image. Contrast analysis shows that a model in which a final plane of Ti abuts a layer of Si with a configuration typical of bulk Si best matches the observations. Moreover, the presence of Ti at the interface seems to stabilize a terminal plane of Si with triple dangling bonds.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

1. Cherns, D., Anstis, G.R. and Hutchison, J.L. Phil. Mag. A 46, 849 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Gibson, J.M., Bean, J.C., Poate, J.M. and Tung, R.T. Appl. Phys. Lett. 41, 818 (1982)Google Scholar
3. Morar, J.F. and Wittmer, M. Phys. Rev. B 37, 2618 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Cherns, D., Smith, D.A., Krakow, W. and Batson, P.E. Phil. Mag. A 45, 107 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Kawarada, H., Ishida, M., Nakanishi, J., Ohdomary, I. and Horiuchi, S. Phil. Mag. A 54, 729 (1986)Google Scholar
6. Chu, J.J., Chen, L.J. and Tu, K.N. J. Appl. Phys. 63, 1163 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Wu, I.C., Chu, J.J. and Chen, L.J. J. Appl. Phys. 60, 3172 (1986)Google Scholar
8. Catana, A., Heintze, M., Lévy, F., Schmid, P.E. and Stadelmann, P. to be published in Springer Verlag Conf. Ser. (1988)Google Scholar
9. Catana, A., Heintze, M., Schmid, P.E. and Stadelmann, P. Inst. of Phys. Conf. Ser. 87, 259 (1987)Google Scholar
10. Fung, M.S., Cheng, H.C. and Chen, L.J. Appl. Phys. Lett. 47, 1312 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Stadelmann, P., Ultramicroscopy 21, 131 (1987)Google Scholar
12. Bonnet, R. and Cousineau, E. Acta Cryst. A 33, 850 (1977)Google Scholar