Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T22:32:34.823Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Micro-Mechanical Modeling of the Pull-Out Behavior of Corrugated Wiredrawn Steel Fibers from Cementitious Matrices.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 February 2011

Gilles Chanvillard
Affiliation:
Laboratoire Géomatériaux, E.N.T.P.E., 69518 Vaulx-en-Velin Cedex, FRANCE
Pierre-Claude Aitcin
Affiliation:
Civil Eng. Dept., University of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec, JIK 2R1, CANADA
Get access

Abstract

The pull-out behavior of non-straight steel fibers cannot always be analyzed solely in terms of bonding. Rather, it is necessary to take into account the mechanical anchorage provided by the fiber geometry.

It is shown in this paper, that in the case of non-straight steel fibers a strong interaction exists between bonding and anchorage. A micro-mechanical model, based on the dissipation of energy during slipping of the fiber is proposed. In this model, bonding is included on the basis of the Coulomb friction law, without reference to a bond-slip law; mechanical anchorage is modelled from plastic deformation of the fiber.

With this model, it is possible to evaluate the significance of some physical parameters such as the water/cement ratio of the matrix, the fiber's geometry and the steel properties. Moreover, this model provides a rational basis for the optimization of the fiber-cementitious matrix interaction from an energy point of view.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Bartos, P. (1981) Int. J. of Cem. Comp., 2, n° 3, p. 118.Google Scholar
2. Gray, R.J. (1984) J. of Mat. Sc., 19, n° 3, p. 861870.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Lawrence, P. (1972) J. of Mat. Sc., 2, n° 1, p. 17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Tattiersall, G.H., Urbanowicz, C.R. (1974) Mag. of Conc. Res., 26, n° 87, p. 105113 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Gokoz, U.N., Naaman, A.E. (1981) Int. J. of Cem. Comp., 3, n° 3, p. 187202.Google Scholar
6. Gopalaratnam, V.S., Abu-Mathkour, H.J. (1987) Proc., Int. Symp. on Fiber Reinforced Concrete, Madras, India, 2, p. 201211.Google Scholar
7. Gopalaratnam, V.S., Jin-Cheng, (1987) Proc., Bonding in Cementitious Composites, Boston, Materials Research Society, 114, p. 225232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Wang, Y., Li, V.C., Backer, S. (1988) Int. J. of C. Comp., 0, n° 3, p. 143149.Google Scholar
9. Nammur, G., Naaman, A.E. (1989) J. of ACI, Mat., 86, n° 1, p. 4557.Google Scholar
10. Brandt, A.M. (1985) J. of Mat. Sc., 20, n° 11, p. 38313841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Naaman, A.E., Shah, S.P. (1976) J. of Struct. Div., ASCE, 102, n° 8, p. 15371549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Stroeven, P. (1979) Heron, 24, n° 4, p. 740.Google Scholar
13. Burakiewicz, A. (1978), RILEM Symp., Sheffield, The Construction Press,p. 355365.Google Scholar
14. Hughes, B.P., Fattuhi, N.I. (1975) Mag. of Conc. Res. vol.27, 22, p. 161166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Maage, M. (1977) RILEM, Mat.and Struct., 10, n° 59, p. 297301.Google Scholar
16. Hing, P., Groves, G.W. (1972) J. of Mat. Sc., 7, n° 4, p. 427434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Chanvillard, G. (1991) Ph.D. thesis, University of Sherbrooke, CanadaGoogle Scholar