Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xfwgj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-22T23:58:47.987Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Methods of Simulating Low Redox Potential (Eh) for a Basalt Repository

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

Carol M. Jantzen*
Affiliation:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Company, Savannah River Laboratory, Aiken, South Carolina 29808
Get access

Abstract

In the selection of a repository for burying vitrified nuclear waste, the leach rate of the waste form in groundwater is of concern. Basaltic groundwaters have inherently low redox potentials which may affect the waste form leach rate. Laboratory simulation of the Eh-pH conditions to be found in a basalt repository can be achieved when crushed basalt is added to deoxygenated deionized water. The effects of other redoxactive waste package components, such as iron, were found to stabilize solution redox potential at different valves under oxic and anoxic conditions. When iron was present, different waste form leach rates were observed with and without oxygen.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Mendel, J.E., Sci. Basis for Nuclear Waste Management VI, Brookins, D.G., ed., Elsevier Publ. Co., New York, 17 (1983).Google Scholar
2. Jacobs, G.K. and Apted, M.J., EOS Trans. Amer. Geophys. Union 62, 1065 (1981).Google Scholar
3. Strachan, D.M., Sci. Basis for Nuclear Waste Management V, W. Lutze, ed., Elsevier Publ. Co., New York 181191 (1982).Google Scholar
4. Mendel, J.E., May 19-21, 1982 Summary Report, PNL-4382, 255 (1982).Google Scholar
5. Lane, D.L., Jones, T.E., and West, M.H., “Preliminary Assessment of Oxygen Consumption and Redox Conditions in a Nuclear Waste Reporitory in Basalt,” RHO-draft (February 1983).Google Scholar
6. McVay, G.L. and Buckwalter, C.Q., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 66, 170174 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Buckwalter, C.Q. and Pederson, L.R., J. Amer. Ceram. Soc. 65, 431436 (1982).Google Scholar
8. Jantzen, C.M., “Effects of Eh (Oxidation Potential) on Borosilicate Waste Glass Durability,” Second International Symposium on Ceramics in Nuclear Waste Management, in press (1984).Google Scholar
9. Westinghouse Electric Corp, RHO-BW-CR-136P/AESD-TME-3142, 187 (1982).Google Scholar
10. Drever, J.I., The Geochemistry of Natural Waters, Prentice Hall, NJ, 388 (1982).Google Scholar
11. Langmuir, D., Procedures in Sedimentary Petrology, Carver, R.E., ed., Wiley Interscience, N.J., 597635 (1979).Google Scholar
12. Garrels, R.M. and Christ, C.L., Solutions, Minerals, and Equilibria, Harper & Row, NY, 435 (1965).Google Scholar
13. Salter, P.F., Ames, L.L., and McGarrah, J.E., RHO-BWI-LD-48 (August 1981).Google Scholar
14. Rai, D., Serne, R.J., Moore, D.A., and Stromatt, R.W., PNL-SA-6766 (1978).Google Scholar
15. Giblin, A.M., Batts, B.D., and Swaine, D.J., Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta. 45, 699709 (1981).Google Scholar
16. Raines, G.E., Rickertsen, L.D., Claiborne, H.C., McElroy, J.L., and Lynch, R.W., Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management 3, Moore, J.A., ed., Plenum Press, New York, 1 (1981).Google Scholar
17. Norris, A.E., ONWI/SUB/79/E511-01200-11 (1979).Google Scholar
18. Runnels, D.D. and R.R. Lindberg, Assoc. Geochem. Cosmochem. Symposium, Helsinki, Finland (1983).Google Scholar
19. Early, T.O., Drewes, D.R., Jacobs, G.K., Routson, R.C., RHO-BW-ST-39-P (1982).Google Scholar
20. Jantzen, C.M., Clarke, D.R., Morgan, P.E.D., and Harker, A.B., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 65,(6), 292300 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Jones, T.E., RHO-RE-SR-5 (1982).Google Scholar
22. Vandergrift, G.F., Bowers, D.L., Gerding, T.J., Fried, S.M., Wilbur, C.K., and Seitz, M.G., “The Interaction of Groundwater and Fresh Basalt Fissure Surfaces and Its Effect on the Migration of Actinides,” presented at the 185th National Meeting of the American Chemical Society, in Seattle, Washington (March 21, 1983).Google Scholar
23. Wicks, G.G., Mosely, W.C., Whitkop, P.G., and Saturday, K.A., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 49, 413428 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar