Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-11T00:49:02.227Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Metal Impurity Mapping in Semiconductor Materials Using X-Ray Fluorescence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

S.A. McHugo
Affiliation:
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA
A.C. Thompson
Affiliation:
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA
H. Padmore
Affiliation:
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA
Get access

Abstract

We present x-ray fluorescence (XRF) results from studies of metal impurities in silicon. A synchrotron-based XRF microprobe, with μm spatial resolution, was used to detect and map the impurities. The sensitivity of the XRF microprobe was determined for copper and iron in silicon using well-characterized standard samples. We have concluded the system can detect one iron or copper precipitate in silicon with a radius of ≈14nm. This sensitivity pertains to other relevant impurities in silicon, such as, chromium, manganese, cobalt, nickel and gold. Furthermore, we have detected and spatially mapped metal impurity precipitates in silicon, which are undetectable by Energy Dispersive Spectroscopy in a Scanning Electron Microscope. These results exhibit the extraordinary sensitivity of the XRF microprobe for metal impurities in semiconductors.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. McColgin, W. C., Lavine, J. P. and Stancampiano, C. V., MRS: Defect and Impurity Engineered Semiconductors and Devices, San Francisco, CA, pg. 713–24, (1995)Google Scholar
2. The National Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors, (Semiconductor Industry Assoc., San Jose, CA 1994), pg. 110 Google Scholar
3. Weber, E. R., Appl. Phys. A. 30, pg. 1, (1983)Google Scholar
4. Heiser, T., McHugo, S., Hieslmair, H. and Weber, E. R., Appl. Phys. Lett. 70, pg. 35763578, (1997)Google Scholar
5. Underwood, J. H., Thompson, A. C., Wu, Y. and Giauque, R. D., Nucl. Instr. Meth. A. 266, pg. 318, (1988)Google Scholar