Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T20:52:22.947Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Measuring size-dependent mechanical properties of electrospun polystyrene fibers using in-situ AFM-SEM

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 January 2012

Russell J. Bailey
Affiliation:
Department of Materials, School of Engineering and Materials Science, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London E1 4NS, UK
Beatriz Cortes-Ballesteros
Affiliation:
Department of Materials, School of Engineering and Materials Science, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London E1 4NS, UK
Hao Zhang
Affiliation:
Department of Materials, School of Engineering and Materials Science, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London E1 4NS, UK
Congwei Wang
Affiliation:
Department of Materials, School of Engineering and Materials Science, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London E1 4NS, UK
Asa H. Barber
Affiliation:
Department of Materials, School of Engineering and Materials Science, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London E1 4NS, UK
Get access

Abstract

The mechanical properties of individual electrospun polystyrene fibers with sub-micron diameters were measured using a combination of atomic force microscopy (AFM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The strain to failure of the electrospun fibers was observed to increase as the fiber diameter decreased. This size dependent mechanical behavior in individual electrospun polystyrene fibers indicates a suppression of localized failure and a shift away from crazing that is dominant in bulk samples.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. van der Sanden, M. C. M. ‘Ultimate Toughness of Amorphous Polymers’ PhD Thesis. Technische Universiteit Eindhoven (1993).Google Scholar
2. Donald, A. M., Kramer, E. J., Polymer 23, 457 (1982).Google Scholar
3. Kramer, E. J., Berger, L. L., Adv. Polym. Sci. 91/92, 1 (1990).Google Scholar
4. Wu, S.. Polym. Eng. Sci. 30, 753 (1990).Google Scholar
5. Henkee, C. S., Kramer, E. J., J. Polym. Sci. Polym. Phys. 22, 721 (1984).Google Scholar
6. Kinloch, A. J., Young, R. J.Fracture Behaviour of Polymers’. Elsevier, London (1985).Google Scholar
7. Baker, S. C., Atkin, N., Gunning, P. A., Granville, N., Wilson, K., Southgate, J., Biomaterials 27, 3136 (2006).Google Scholar
8. Stachewicz, U., Peker, I., Tu, W., Barber, A. H., ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 3, 1991 (2011).Google Scholar
9. Hang, F., Lu, D., Bailey, R.J., Jimenez-Palomar, I., Stachewicz, U., Cortes-Ballesteros, B., Davies, M., Zech, M., Bödefeld, C., and Barber, A.H., Nanotechnology 22, 355708 (2011).Google Scholar
10. Wang, W., Ciselli, P., Kuznetsov, E., Peijs, T., Barber, A. H. 366, 1613 (2008).Google Scholar
11. Sader, J. E., Chon, J. W. M., Mulvaney, P., Rev. Sci. Instrum. 70, 3967 (1999).Google Scholar