Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xm8r8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-28T15:05:27.861Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

MBE Growth of GaInAsSb/A1GaAsSb Double Heterostructures for Diode Lasers Emitting Beyond 2 μm

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

S.J. Eglash
Affiliation:
Lincoln Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Lexington, MA 02173-9108
H.K. Choi
Affiliation:
Lincoln Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Lexington, MA 02173-9108
G.W. Turner
Affiliation:
Lincoln Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Lexington, MA 02173-9108
M.C. Finn
Affiliation:
Lincoln Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Lexington, MA 02173-9108
Get access

Abstract

Molecular beam epitaxy has been used to grow GaInAsSb/AlGaAsSb double heterostructures, lattice matched to GaSb substrates, for diode laser emission at 2.3 μm. Doublecrystal x-ray diffraction measurements were used to determine alloy lattice constants, and photoluminescence and infrared absorption spectroscopies were used to determine the bandgaps of the GaInAsSb layers. Alloy compositions measured by Auger electron spectroscopy were consistent with measured lattice constants and bandgaps. Diode lasers fabricated from the double heterostructures were operated in the pulsed mode at room temperature with threshold current densities as low as 1.5 kA cm−2, differential quantum efficiencies as high as 50 percent, and output power as high as 900 mW per facet.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Bochkarev, A.E., Dolginov, L.M., Drakin, A.E., Eliseev, P.G., and Sverdlov, B.N., Sov. J. Quantum Electron. 18, 1362 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Baranov, A.N., Danilova, T.N., Dzhurtanov, B.E., Imenkov, A.N., Konnikov, S.G., Litvak, A.M., Usmanskii, V.E., and Yakovlev, Yu.P., Sov. Tech. Phys. Lett. 14, 727 (1988); A.N. Baranov, A.N. Imenkov, M.P. Mikhailova, A.A. Rogachev, and Yu.P. Yakovlev, Proc. SPLE 1048, 188 (1989).Google Scholar
3. Chiu, T.H., Tsang, W.T., Ditzenberger, J.A., and Ziel, J.P. van der, Appl. Phys. Lett. 49, 1051 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Eglash, S.J. and Choi, H.K., Appl. Phys. Lett. 57, 1292 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Choi, H.K. and Eglash, S.J., IEEE J. Quantum Electron., June 1991 (to be published).Google Scholar
6. Turner, G.W., Nechay, B.A., and Eglash, S.J., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 8, 283 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Eglash, S.J., Choi, H.K., and Turner, G.W., J. Cryst. Growth (to be published).Google Scholar
8. See, for example, Dodson, B.W. and Tsao, J.Y., Annu. Rev. Mater. Sci. 19, 419 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Casey, H.C. Jr., and Panish, M.B., Heterostructure Lasers, Part B (Academic Press, New York, 1978), pp. 148.Google Scholar
10. DeWinter, J.C., Pollack, M.A., Srivastava, A.K., and Zyskind, J.L., J. Electron. Mater. 14, 729 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Chang, C-A., Ludeke, R., Chang, L.L., and Esaki, L., Appl. Phys. Lett. 31, 759 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar