Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Materials aspects of advanced repository concepts for higher toxicity waste

  • Ian G. McKinley (a1) and Ellie M. Scourse (a1)

Abstract

Most designs of disposal facilities for higher toxicity radioactive wastes were developed for generic feasibility assessment and hence tend to be rather simple in terms of layout and conservative in the choice of engineered barrier materials. Recently, there has been a trend to reassess such designs in the light of moves towards implementation, where robustness in terms of post closure safety needs to be balanced against the requirements to assure safety, quality, and economic practicality during operation, to minimise environmental impact and to gain public acceptance. Studies to date have, however, tended to focus predominantly on variants of layout and engineered barrier geometry. Evaluation of alternative materials has received less consideration, despite the huge advances in materials science over the last couple of decades and likely further developments in the time until repositories become operational. This paper will examine the constraints that led to the choice of the most common materials selected for barriers within “wet” host rocks and examine the extent to which performance could be optimised by use of alternative materials.

Copyright

References

Hide All
1 SKBF/KBS, “KBS-3 – Final Storage of spent nuclear fuel” (1983).
2 Nagra, “Project Gewahr 1985 (English summary)” Nagra Project Report NGB 85-09 (1985).
3 SKB, “Initial state report for the safety assessment SR-Can” SKB TR-06-21 (2006)
4 Nagra, “Project Opalinus Clay, Safety Report” Nagra Technical Report 02-05 (2002).
5 JAEA and FEPC, “Second progress report on research and development for TRU waste disposal in Japan” FEPC TRU-TR2-2007-01 (2007).
6 Makino, H., Umeki, H., Ochi, Y., Hioki, K., Okubo, H., Matsumoto, M., Sato, O., Masuda, S. and I.McKinley, G., I.G. In Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XXXIII, these proceedings
7 NUMO, “Development of repository concepts for volunteer siting environments”, NUMOTR-04-03 (2004).
8 Bel, J.J.P., Wickham, S.M. and Gens., R.M.F. In Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XXIX, edited by Iseghem, P. Van, (Mat. Res. Soc. Proc. 932, Warrendale, PA, 2006), pp 2332.
9 McKinley, I.G., Apted, M., Umeki, H. and Kawamura, H., “Cavern disposal concepts for HLW/SF: assuring operational practicality and safety with maximum programme flexibility.” Proc. ESDRED workshop, 06-1 – 06-10 (2008).
10 NUMO, “Proceedings of the International Workshop on Bentonite-Cement Interaction in Repository Environments”, NUMO-TR-04-05 (2004).

Materials aspects of advanced repository concepts for higher toxicity waste

  • Ian G. McKinley (a1) and Ellie M. Scourse (a1)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed