Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-jwnkl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T11:27:51.405Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Magnetic Anisotropy Constants of Epitaxial (110) Fe/GaAs Films from 77k To 293k Studied by Magneto-Resistance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 September 2012

Daniel K. Lottis ,
G. A. Prinz  and
E. Dan Dahlberg
Daniel K. Lottis
Affiliation:
School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455
G. A. Prinz
Affiliation:
Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, D.C. 20375-5000
E. Dan Dahlberg
Affiliation:
School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455
Get access

Abstract

A first-order phase transition in the magnetization of Fe films, driven by an applied magnetic field, was first reported by Hathaway and Prinz [1]. Further studies were performed on this phase transition using anisotropic magnetoresistance measurements by Riggs and Dahlberg [2]. Here we report the extension of these studies to include temperatures between 77K and 293K. Emphasis is on a determination of the fourth-order and uniaxial anisotropy constants (K1 and Ku). It is shown that the temperature dependence of the anisotropy energies in these films varies with thickness, which may be useful in sorting out the origin and magnitude of different contributions to the total effective anisotropy. The present study suggests that similar studies of (110) iron on other substrates might contribute to achieving a better understanding of in-plane anisotropies in epitaxial films.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 151: Symposium G – Growth, Characterization and Properties of Ultrathin Magnetic Films and Multilayers , 1989 , 219
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Hathaway, K. and Prinz, G.A., Phys. Rev. Letter 47, 1761 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2] Dahlberg, E.D., Riggs, K.T., and Prinz, G.A., J. Appl. Phys. 63, 4270 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3] Richter, Roy, Gay, J.G. and Smith, J.R., PRL 54, 2704 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4] Gay, J.G. and Richter, Roy, PRL 56, 2728 (1986)Google Scholar
[5] Jansen, H.J.F., J. Appl. Phys 64, 5604 (1988)Google Scholar
[6] Jonker, B.T., Walker, K.H., Kisker, E., Prinz, G.A., and Carbonne, C., PRL 57, 142 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7] Koon, N.C., Jonker, B.T., Volkening, F.A., Krebs, J.J., and Prinz, G.A., PRL 59, 2463 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8] Pescia, D., Stampanoni, M., Bona, G.L., Vaterlaus, A., Willis, R.F., and Meier, F., PRL 58, 2126 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9] Riggs, K.T., Prinz, G.A., and Dahlberg, E.D., to be submitted for publication.Google Scholar
[10] References [1] and [10] and works cited therein.Google Scholar
[11] Krebs, J.J., Rachford, F.J., Lubitz, P., and Prinz, G.A., J. Appl. Phys. 53, 8058 (1982)Google Scholar