Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-7drxs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T12:05:48.553Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Low Temperature Route to Cordierite Ceramics Using a Reactive Liquid Phase Sintering Aid. Dense Body Preparation and Green Tape Fabrication

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

Ryan W. Dupon
Affiliation:
Corporate Research and Development Raychem Corporation, 300 Constitution Dr., Menlo Park, CA 94025
Richard L. Mcconville
Affiliation:
Corporate Research and Development Raychem Corporation, 300 Constitution Dr., Menlo Park, CA 94025
Mark S. Thompson
Affiliation:
Corporate Research and Development Raychem Corporation, 300 Constitution Dr., Menlo Park, CA 94025
Get access

Abstract

Bismuth oxide has been found to be a useful flux for the preparation of dense body cordierite (Mg2Al4Si5O18). The use of as little as 2 atom% bismuth ion with the appropriate mixture of commercially available oxide starting materials serves to produce fully dense crystalline cordierite after firing at 1000 °C. The microstructure of the sintered body (92 w/o% cordierite, 8 w/o% bismuth oxide) has the residual bismuth oxide flux distributed in discontinuous domains at the grain boundaries and at the triple points. Physical properties such as thermal coefficient of expansion and dielectric constant are largely unperturbed by the presence of the flux.

Green tapes having high volume fraction solids loading have been fabricated from bismuth oxide-cordierite precursor powders. The subsequent firing at 1000 °C of laminated green tapes yields fully dense ceramic bodies of crystalline cordierite.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Chowdry, U. and Sleight, A.W., Ann. Rev. Mater. Sci. 17, 323 (1987).Google Scholar
2. Gregory, A.G. and Veasey, T.J., J. Mater. Sci. a, 1312 (1971).Google Scholar
3. Zdaniewski, W., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 58, 163 (1975).Google Scholar
4. Bridge, D.R., Holland, D., and McMillan, P.W., Glass Technology 26, 286 (1985).Google Scholar
5. Watanabe, K. and Giess, E., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 6, C102 (1985).Google Scholar
6. Moyer, J.R., Prunier, A.R., Hughes, N.N., and Winterton, R.C. in Better Ceramics Through Chemistry II, edited by Brinker, C.J., Clark, D.E., and Ulrich, D.R. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 73, Pittsburgh, PA 1986) pp. 117122.Google Scholar
7. Gensse, C. and Chowdry, U. in Better Ceramics Through Chemistry II, edited by Brinker, C.J., Clark, D.E., and Ulrich, D.R. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 73, Pittsburgh, PA 1986) pp. 693703.Google Scholar
8. Atom% here is defined as the ratio of moles of bismuth ions present to the sum of the moles of magnesium, silicon, aluminum, and bismuth ions.Google Scholar
9. Hazen, R.M. and Finger, L.W., Comparative Crystal Chemistry, (Wiley, New York, 1982), p. 134.Google Scholar
10. Wimmer, J.M., Graham, H.C., and Tallan, N.M. in Electrical Conductivity in Glasses and Ceramics. Part B, edited by Tallan, N.M. (Marcel Dekker, New York, 1974) pp. 625635.Google Scholar
11. Particle Data Laboratories, Ltd., Elmhurst, IL.Google Scholar