Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T19:42:48.236Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Low Temperature p- and n- Type Doping of InSb Grown on GaAs Using Molecular Beam Epitaxy.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

Phillip E. Thompson
Affiliation:
NavaI Research Laboratory, Washington, DC 20375
John L. Davis
Affiliation:
NavaI Research Laboratory, Washington, DC 20375
David S. Simons
Affiliation:
National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, 20899
Get access

Abstract

30 nm thick layers of Be-doped InSb were grown by MBE, sandwiched between undoped layers of InSb on semi-insulating GaAs substrates. Using secondary ion mass spectroscopy (SIMS), it has been demonstrated that the p-type dopant, Be, undergoes an anomalous migration towards the top surface for substrate growth temperatures in excess of 340°C. A thermal diffusion process can be eliminated as an explanation since there was not an associated diffusion towards the substrate. At a substrate growth temperature of 340°C, the Be-doped layer had backside and frontside doping concentration gradients of 0.067 and 0.147 decade/nm. respectively. A sample grown at 420°C had a comparable backside doping concentration gradient, but the frontside gradient was essentially zero, i. e., uniform doping tothe surface. Electrical activation of the Be dopant, when grown at 340°C, compared to activation in GaAs grown at 580°C. was 38% and 47% for growth rates of 1.0 and 0.5 μm/h. While the Si dopant does not undergo a migration comparable to that of Be, it has been demonstrated that n-type doping of InSb with Si must be done at growth temperatures less than or equal to 340°C to obtain high carrier concentrations. The maximum n-type carrier concentration obtained was 6.2x1018/cm3, for a 0.5 μm/h growth rate at 340°C.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Yen, M. Y., J. Appl. Phys. 64(6), 3306 (1988).Google Scholar
2. Chyi, J.-I., Kalem, S., Kumar, N. S., Litton, C. W., and Morkoc, H., Appl. Phys. Lett. 53(12), 1092 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. McConnville, C. F., Whitehouse, C. R., Williams, G. M., Cullis, A. G., Ashley, T., Skolnick, M. S., Brown, G. T., and Courtney, S. J., J. Crystal Growth 95, 228 (1989).Google Scholar
4. Dobbelaere, W., Boeck, J. De, and Borghs, G., Appl. Phys. Lett. 55(18), 1856 (1989).Google Scholar
5. Davis, J. L. and Thompson, P. E., Appl. Phys. Left. 54(22), 2235 (1989).Google Scholar
6. Oh, J. E., Bhattacharya, P. K., Chen, Y. C., and Tsukamoto, S., J. Appl. Phys. 66(8), 3618 (1989).Google Scholar
7. Rao, M. V., Echard, R., Thompson, P. E., Berry, A. K., Mulpuri, S., and Moore, F. to be published in Long-Wavelength Semiconductor Devices. Materials, and Processes, edited by Katz, A., Biefeld, B. M., Malik, R. J., and Gunshor, R. L. (Mat. Res. Soc. Proc.).Google Scholar
8. Yang, M.-J., Waterman, J. R., Wagner, R. J., Thompson, P. E., and Davis, J. L. to be published in Electronic. Otical. and Device Properties of Layered Structures, edited by Hayes, J. R., Hybertsen, M. S., and Weber, E. R. (Mat. Res. Soc. Proc.)Google Scholar
9. Wilson, R. G. (private communication).Google Scholar
10. Parker, S. D., Williams, R. L., Droopad, R., Stradling, R. A., Barnham, K. W. J., Holmes, S. N., Laverty, J., Phillips, C. C., Skuras, E., Thomas, R., Zhang, X., Staton-Bevan, A., and Pashley, D. W., Semicond. Sci. and Tech. 4(9), 663 (1989).Google Scholar