Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4rdrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-26T18:49:29.286Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Liquid Infiltration of MgO and Al2O3 Thin Films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

Michael P. Mallamaci ,
Sundar Ramamurthy  and
C. Barry Carter
Michael P. Mallamaci
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, University of Minnesota, 421 Washington Ave. SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455-0132
Sundar Ramamurthy
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, University of Minnesota, 421 Washington Ave. SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455-0132
C. Barry Carter
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, University of Minnesota, 421 Washington Ave. SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455-0132
Get access

Abstract

The deposition of glass films on thin ceramic substrates is a novel method for investigation of the initial stages of liquid infiltration into the grain boundaries of these materials. By maintaining electron transparency at all stages of the experiment, the transmission electron microscope (TEM) can be used to characterize individual grain boundaries before and after penetration by a liquid. The method has been tested for the MgO and AI2O3 systems, which have extensively studied experimental counterparts in which the corresponding bulk materials are infiltrated by a siliceous liquid.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 318: Symposium Ca – Interface Control of Electrical, Chemical, and Mechanical Properties , 1993 , 589
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Flaitz, P. L. and Pask, J. A., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 70, 449–55 (1987).Google Scholar
2 Shaw, T. M. and Duncombe, P. R., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 74, 2495–505 (1991).Google Scholar
3 Ramamurthy, S., Mallamaci, M. P., Carter, C. B., Duncombe, P. R. and Shaw, T. M., in Proc. 51st Annual Meeting of the Microscopy Society of America, edited by Bailey, G. W. and Reider, C. L. (San Francisco Press, Inc., San Francisco, CA, 1993), p. 948–9.Google Scholar
4 Jackson, B., Ford, W. F. and White, H., Trans. Br. Ceram. Soc. 62, 577–601 (1963).Google Scholar
5 Kim, J.-J., Kim, B.-K., Song, B.-M., Kim, D.-Y. and Yoon, D. N., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 70, 734–37 (1987).Google Scholar
6 Susnitzky, D. W. and Carter, C. B., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 69, C–217–C–220 (1986).Google Scholar
7 Norton, M. G., Summerfelt, S. R. and Carter, C. B., Appl. Phys. Lett. 56, 2246–2248 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar