Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T13:35:28.963Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Leaching of Used Candu™ Fuel in the Presence of Clay, Titanium and Granite Rock

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

John C. Tait
Affiliation:
Atomic Energy of Canada Limited, Whiteshell Nuclear Research Establishment, Pinawa, Manitoba, Canada, ROE ILO
Simcha Stroes-Gascoyne
Affiliation:
Atomic Energy of Canada Limited, Whiteshell Nuclear Research Establishment, Pinawa, Manitoba, Canada, ROE ILO
Robert J. Porth
Affiliation:
Atomic Energy of Canada Limited, Whiteshell Nuclear Research Establishment, Pinawa, Manitoba, Canada, ROE ILO
Don Wood
Affiliation:
Atomic Energy of Canada Limited, Whiteshell Nuclear Research Establishment, Pinawa, Manitoba, Canada, ROE ILO
Robert B. Heimann
Affiliation:
Alberta Research Council, 250 Karl Clark Road, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T6H 5X2
Get access

Abstract

Dissolution experiments have been performed at 95 or 100°C on used fuel in the presence of various components of a disposal system: granite rock, clay (Na-montmorillonite, illite), container (titanium), and two groundwaters with different ionic strengths (0.0015, 0.28). The results showed that Cs and Sr release to solution is highest in the high-ionic-strength groundwater and that clay type is less important in determining short-term release from the fuel. It also appears that after an initial release period lasting about 10 to 20 days, radionuclide release from the fuel to solution slows considerably. Cs was found to sorb more effectively than Sr on illite and montmoril-lonite, while Sr sorbed more effectively than Cs on the granite.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Hancox, V.T., Proceedings of the 21st Annual Conference of the Japanese Atomic Industrial Forum, Tokyo, April 14 (1988).Google Scholar
2. Johnson, L.H., Shoesmith, D.W. and Stroes-Gascoyne, S., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XI, edited by Apted, M.J. and Westerman, R.E. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 112, Boston, Mass 1987) pp. 249257.Google Scholar
3. Stroes-Gascoyne, S., Johnson, L.H., Tait, J.C. and Sellinger, D.M., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XII, edited by Werme, L.O. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc, Berlin, FRG 1988), (these proceedings).Google Scholar
4. Heimann, R.B., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management X, edited by Bates, J.K. and Seefeldt, W.B. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 84, Boston, Mass. 1987) pp. 409420.Google Scholar
5. Abry, R.M., Abry, R.C.F., Ticknor, K.V. and Vandergraaf, T.T., Atomic Energy of Canada Limited Technical Record, TR-189, (1982).Google Scholar
6. Stroes-Gascoyne, S., Johnson, L.H., Beeley, P.A. and Sellinger, D.M., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management IX, edited by Werme, L.O. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 50, Stockholm 1985) pp. 317326 Google Scholar
7. Stroes-Gascoyne, S., Johnson, L.H. and Sellinger, D.M., Nucl. Technol. 77, 320 (1987).Google Scholar
8. Heimann, R.B. and Johnson, L.H., in Advances in Ceramics, edited by Wicks, G.G. and Ross, W.A. (Amer. Ceram. Soc. 1984), 8, pp. 337345.Google Scholar
9. Allard, B. and Torstenfeit, B. in KBS Technical Reports tr-83–60 (1983) SKF, Stockholm.Google Scholar
10. Lemire, R.J., Atomic Energy of Canada Limited Report, AECL-9549, (1988).Google Scholar