Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T02:23:07.037Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Laser-Assisted Growth of ZnSe by Metalorganic Molecular Beam Epitaxy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

C. A. Coronado
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering
E. Ho
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Research Laboratory of Electronics Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139
L. A. Kolodziejski
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Research Laboratory of Electronics Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139
C. A. Huber
Affiliation:
Bunting Institute, Radcliffe College, Cambridge, MA 02138
Get access

Abstract

By employing metalorganic molecular beam epitaxy (MOMBE), the heteroepitaxy of ZnSe on GaAs has been achieved using diethylselenium and diethylzinc. Significant (10x ∼ 15x) growth rate enhancement has been observed when radiation from an argon ion laser is incident to the surface; photons with energies greater than the bandgap at the growth temperature contribute to the enhancement. Photo-thermal effects are ruled out due to the low power densities used (∼200 mW/cm2). Growth rate enhancementis found to be a function of substrate temperature, VI/II gas flow ratio, laser wavelength and intensity. To further understand the effect of the laser on ZnSe growth, solid sources of Zn and Se are used in conjunction with metalorganic gas sources. The effect of laser illumination is found to depend on the combination of precursors employed: both growth rate enhancement and growth rate suppression are observed. Laser-assisted growth has application for achieving. selective area epitaxy and for tuning the surface stoichiometry.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Haase, M. A., Qui, J., DePuydt, J. M. and Cheng, H., Appl. Phys. Lett. 52, 1272 (1991).Google Scholar
2. Jeon, H., Ding, J., Patterson, W., Nurmikko, A. V., Xie, W., Grillo, D. C., Kobayashi, M., and Gunshor, R. L., Appl. Phys. Lett. 52, 3619 (1991).Google Scholar
3. Park, R. M., Troffer, M. B., Rouleau, C. M., Depuydt, J. M. and Haase, M. A., Appl. Phys. Lett. 51, 2127 (1990).Google Scholar
4. Ohkawa, K., Karasawa, T. and Mitsuyu, T., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 30, L152 (1991)Google Scholar
5. Xie, W., Grillo, D. C., Gunshor, R. L., Kobayashi, M., Hua, G. C., Otsuka, N., Jeon, H., Ding, J., and Nurmikko, A. V., Appl. Phys. Lett. 60, xxx (1992).Google Scholar
6. Coronado, C. A., Ho, E., Kolodziejski, L. A. and Huber, C. A., Appl. Phys. Lett. 61, xxx (1992).Google Scholar
7.The estimate for the level of carbon incorporation is determined by assuming similar sensitivities for characteristic carbon-related species in ZnSe and GaAs matrices. No significant changes in the Se-C or C ion signals were observed when sputtering across the ZnSe/GaAs interface. Furthermore, the carbon concentration in the GaAs was found to be near the detectability limit of the instrument. Since the GaAs substrates were carbon controlled (carbon concentration < 1016 cm−3) and the nominal detectability limit of carbon in GaAs is generally on the order of 1016 cm−3, a worst case estimate of the carbon incorporation in the ZnSe film was estimated to be on the order of 1016 cm−3.Google Scholar
8. Yoshikawa, A., Okamoto, T., Fujimoto, T., Onoue, K., Yamaga, S., and Kasai, H., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 29, L225 (1990).Google Scholar
9. Hou, H., Zhang, Z., Ray, U., and Vernon, M., J. Chem. Phys. 22, 1728 (1990).Google Scholar
10. Ohishi, M., Saito, H., Okano, H. and Ohmori, K., J. Cryst. Growth 25, 538 (1989).Google Scholar
11. Simpson, J., Adams, S. J. A., Wang, S. Y., Wallace, J. M., Prior, K. A., and Cavenett, B. C., J. Cryst. Growth 117, 134 (1992).Google Scholar