Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T13:38:05.432Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Iterative Performance Assessment for the Greater Confinement Disposal Facilities: Preliminary Results of Round Two*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 1992

Natalie E. Olague
Affiliation:
Sandia National Laboratories, Department 6331, Albuquerque, NM 87185
T.A. Baer
Affiliation:
GRAM Inc., 8500 Menaul Blvd., Suite B370, Albuquerque, NM 87112
S.H. Conrad
Affiliation:
Sandia National Laboratories, Department 6331, Albuquerque, NM 87185
Get access

Abstract

The Department of Energy's Nevada Operations Office has disposed of a small quantity of transuranic waste at the Greater Confinement Disposal (GCD) facility in Area 5 of the Nevada Test Site. The Environmental Protection Agency standards for disposal of transuranic waste (40 CFR 191) require that a performance assessment be conducted and an iterative approach has been adopted. This approach consists of using performance assessment results to guide the collection of site characterization data, and in turn, new site characterization data is incorporated into each successive iteration of the performance assessment. The results of the first iteration indicated that the GCD site should be able to comply with 40 CFR 191. This paper presents results of the second iteration based on results from site-specific environmental tracer studies. These studies indicate significantly lower recharge values then those used in the first performance assessment iteration. For performance assessment these results imply that the downward ground-water advection pathway may be negligible, and therefore, the upward liquid diffusion pathway becomes more significant. The models and the model parameters that were used to simulate this upward pathway have been refined. The preliminary results from these models still indicate that the GCD facility should be able to comply with the Containment Requirements in 40 CFR 191.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This work performed for the U.S. Department of Energy under contract DE-AC04-76DP00789.

References

REFERENCES

1. EPA, Federal Register, 50, 38066 (1985).Google Scholar
2. Price, LL, Conrad, S.H., Zimmerman, D.A., Olague, N.E., Gaither, K.C., Cox, W.B., McCord, J.T. and Harlan, C.P., Preliminary Performance Assessment of the Greater Confinement Disposal Facility at the Nevada Test Site, Volume 1: Executive Summary, Volume 2: Technical Discussion, Volume 3: Supporting Details, SAND91-0047, Sandia National Laboratories, 1992 (to be published).Google Scholar
3. Bonano, E.J., Cranwell, R.M. and Davis, P.A., Radioactive Waste Management and the Nuclear Fuel Cycle, 13, 229 (1989).Google Scholar
4. Conrad, S.H., to be presented at 1993 International High-Level Radioactive Waste Management Conference, Las Vegas, NV, May 1993.Google Scholar
5. Olague, N.E. and Price, L.L., in Proceedings of WM '91, Volume 2, (1991), pp. 525–53. 1.Google Scholar
6. Harris, G.A., Radionuclide Uptake in Plants, EGG-SARE-8769, (Idaho National Engineering Laboratory, 1989).Google Scholar
7. Hunter, R.B. and Medica, P.A., Status of Flora and Fauna on the Nevada Test Site, DOE/NV/10630-2, (DOE, 1989).Google Scholar
8. Iman, R.L. and Shortencarier, M.J., A FORTRAN 77 Program and User's Guide for the Generation of Latin Hypercube Samples for Use with Computer Models, SAND83-2365, (Sandia National Laboratories, 1984).Google Scholar
9. Campbell, G.S., Soil Physics with Basic Transport Models for Soil-Plant Systems, (Elsevier Science Publishers, New York, 1985), pg. 111.Google Scholar
10. Romney, F.M., Wallace, A., Kirnear, J.E. and Wood, R.A., Radioecology of Transuranic and other Radionuclides in Desert Ecosystems, NVO-224, (DOE, 1982).Google Scholar
11. Price, K.R., J. Environ. Quality, 2, 62 (1973).Google Scholar
12. Francis, C.W., J. Environ. Quality, 2, 67 (1973).Google Scholar