Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-dnltx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T22:36:16.728Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Ion Implantation Monitoring of GaAs Using Thermal Waves

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2011

R. Garcia
Affiliation:
Chemical, Bio and Materials Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ.
E. J. Jaquez
Affiliation:
Chemical, Bio and Materials Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ.
R.J. Culbertson
Affiliation:
Physics and Astronomy Department, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ.
C. D'Acosta
Affiliation:
Motorola, Inc., Tempe, AZ.
C. Jasper
Affiliation:
Motorola, Inc., Tempe, AZ.
Get access

Abstract

Laser modulated thermoreflectivity, also called thermal wave technology, has been used in recent years to monitor ion implantation dose by monitoring the damage due to implantation. The thermal properties which are affected by lattice perturbations and other crystal imperfections are tracked by this technique. A gauge capability study was performed on the Thermawave TP300 for monitoring ion implantation of GaAs wafers. The results are presented. In order to determine the sensitivity of the technique to changes in dose, a matrix of GaAs and Si wafers was measured. During this study a downward trend was observed in the repeatability of our results. It is shown that damage to a sample during implantation will relax to a certain degree at room temperature. This damage relaxation can take up to 80 hours at room temperature and can be observed using thermal waves. It is shown that “hot wafer decay” follows a logarithmic decay which is indicative of a diffusion process. At 180°C the decay lasts less than 1 minute which indicates that the defects causing this phenomenon have a low activation energy.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Newbury, D.E., Advanced Scanning Electron Microscopy And X-Ray Microanalysis, (Plenum Press, New York 1986), p.82.Google Scholar
2 Rosencwaig, A. et al. , APL. 46 (11), 1013 (1985)Google Scholar
3 Bivas, A., Smith, W.L., Kola, R.R., Radzamski, Z.J. and Rozgonyi, G.A. J. Of Crystal Growth 103 (1990) 200205 Google Scholar
4 Perez-Wilson, M., Machine/Process Capability Study, (Advanced Systems Consultants, Scottsdale, Az. 1989) pp. 5786.Google Scholar
5 Levin, Y., Herbots, N. and Dunham, S., J. Mater. Res., Vol.8, No.9, 2305 (1993).Google Scholar
6 Shewmon, P.G., Diffusion In Solids. (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1963) p. 18 Google Scholar
7 Tan, T.Y. and Grösele, U., Appl. Phys. A37, 1 (1985).Google Scholar