Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T16:10:33.176Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Intra- and Intergranular Fracture of Diamond Thin Films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

H. A. Hoff
Affiliation:
Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC 20375-5000
A. A. Morrish
Affiliation:
Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC 20375-5000
W. A. Carrington
Affiliation:
University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33620
J. E. Butler
Affiliation:
Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC 20375-5000
B. B. Rath
Affiliation:
Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC 20375-5000
Get access

Abstract

Diamond thin films have been synthesized at low pressures by chemical vapor deposition (CVD) and, recently, at ambient atmosphere with an oxygen-acetylene welding torch. By the application of appropriate thermal or mechanical stresses to the substrate, the diamond films can be delaminated. The delaminated films which are only a few microns thick have been fractured by manual bending. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) examination of fractured CVD diamond films shows the presence of primarily intragranular fracture attesting to the inherent strength of the films. Using transmission electron microscopy (TEM), twinning and stacking faults are seen within the crystallites of the films along the fracture surfaces. By combining SEM and TEM examination, the relative degree of intragranular fracture found in films synthesized by both CVD and oxygen-acetylene torch has been investigated. Possible mechanisms for the intragranular fracture and the relative strength of such films are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Angus, J.C. and Hayman, C.C., Science 241, 913 (1988).Google Scholar
2. Hanssen, L.M., Carrington, W.A., Butler, J.E., and Snail, K.A., Mater. Lett. 7, 289 (1988); W.A. Carrington, L.M. Hanssen, K.A. Snail, D. Oakes, and J.E.Butler, Met. Trans. 20A, 1282 (1989).Google Scholar
3. Gigl, P.D., in High Pressure Science and Technology, Vol.1, edited by Timmerhaus, K.D. and Barber, M.S. (Plenum Press, New York, 1979), p. 914.Google Scholar
4. Trueb, L.F. and Butterman, W.C., Am. Min. 54, 412 (1969); K.J. Dunn and M. Lee, J. Mater. Sci. 4, 882 (1979).Google Scholar
5. Walmsley, J.C. and Lang, A.R., J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 2, 785 (1983).Google Scholar
6. Williams, B.E. and Glass, J.T., J. Mater. Res. 4, 373 (1989); W.Zhu, A.R.Badzian and R.Messier, J. Mater. Res. 4, 659 (1989).Google Scholar
7. Butler, J.E., Celie, F.G., Oakes, D.B., Hanssen, L.M., Carrington, W.A., and Snail, K.A., High Temp. Sci., in press (1989).Google Scholar
8. Knight, D.S. and White, W.B., J. Mater. Res. 4, 385 (1989).Google Scholar