Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T05:12:22.404Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Interfacial Solid-State Oxidation Reactions In The Sn-Doped In2O3 On Si And Si0.85Ge0.15 Alloy Systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

Cleva W. Ow-Yang ,
Yuzo Shigesato ,
Rita Mohanty  and
David C. Paine
Cleva W. Ow-Yang
Affiliation:
Division of Engineering, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912
Yuzo Shigesato
Affiliation:
Advanced Glass R&D Center, Asahi Glass Co. Ltd., Yokohama, 221, Japan
Rita Mohanty
Affiliation:
Division of Engineering, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912
David C. Paine
Affiliation:
Division of Engineering, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912
Get access

Abstract

We have experimentally demonstrated that the interface between ITO and Si or Si0.85Ge0.15 is metastable, with silicon reducing ITO to form an amorphous oxide layer and In metal. A 400nm-thick ITO layer was deposited on two types of substrates: p-type, <100> silicon wafers and a silicon wafer with a 400nm-thick layer of Si0.85Ge0.15 grown by CVD. Annealing of the ITO/Si system resulted in the growth of a 5nm-thick planar, interfacial SiO2 layer and the formation of In metal in the ITO above the SiO2 layer. In contrast, annealing of the ITO/Si0.85Ge0.15 system produced an interfacial Si0.85Ge0.15O2 layer that was non-uniform in thickness and which had a non-planar surface morphology. As-deposited and annealed samples were characterized by HREM, EDS, and C-V measurements. Thermodynamic and kinetic arguments predicted both of the different reaction paths that were observed in the two systems.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 345: Symposium M – Flat Panel Display Materials , 1994 , 191
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Kobayashi, H., Ishida, T., Nakato, Y., and Tsubomura, H., J. Appl. Phys. 69, 1736 (1991).Google Scholar
2. Hagerott, M., Jeon, H., Nurmikko, A. V., Xie, W., Grillo, D. C., Kobayashi, M., and Gunshor, R. L., Appl. Phys. Lett. 60, 2825 (1992).Google Scholar
3. Shigesato, Y. and Paine, D. C., Appl. Phys. Lett. 62, 1268 (1993); Y. Shigesato and D. C. Paine, Appl. Phys. Lett. 62, 1268 (1993), S. Takaki, and T. Haranoh, Appl. Surf. Sci. 48/49, 269 (1991).Google Scholar
4. Ow-Yang, C. W., Shigesato, Y., and Paine, D. C., Interface Control of Electrical, Chemical, and Mechanical Properties. edited by Murarka, S., Ohmi, T., Rose, K., Seidel, T. (Mater. Res. Soc. 318, Pittsburgh, PA, 1994).Google Scholar
5. Irene, E. A., J. Electrochem. Soc. 125 (10), 1708 (1978).Google Scholar
6. Mego, T. J., Solid State Technology (May 1990).Google Scholar
7. Nicollian, E. H. and Brews, J.R., MOS Physics and Technology (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1982).Google Scholar
8. Paine, D. C., Caragianis, C., Schwartzman, A., J. Appl. Phys. 70, 5081 (1991).Google Scholar