Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T17:23:11.737Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Interfacial Processes in Nanoporous Platinum: Double-Layer Charging Versus Chemisorption

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

R.N. Viswanath ,
D. Kramer ,
H. Rösner  and
J. Weissmüller
R.N. Viswanath
Affiliation:
Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe, Institut für Nanotechnologie, Karlsruhe, Germany
D. Kramer
Affiliation:
Universität des Saarlandes, Technische Physik, Saarbrücken, Germany
H. Rösner
Affiliation:
Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe, Institut für Nanotechnologie, Karlsruhe, Germany
J. Weissmüller
Affiliation:
Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe, Institut für Nanotechnologie, Karlsruhe, Germany Universität des Saarlandes, Technische Physik, Saarbrücken, Germany
Get access

Abstract

When conductive solids with nanoscale porosity are immersed in electrolyte and biased against a suitable counter electrode, the surface is charged and the properties of the matter at the surface vary reversibly as the function of the bias voltage. Due to the immense surface area at nanoscale pore size, the local changes are reflected in the macroscopic materials properties. Specifically, changes in the superficial interatomic bonding lead to a stress and strain of the material, with strain amplitude and strain energy density of sufficient magnitude to suggest possible application as actuator materials. We discuss an experiment which provides an insight into the underlying microscopic processes at the metal electrolyte interface: are changes in the surface bonding in the metal dominant, or does the effect arise mainly from the formation of chemical bonds with adsorbates? We studied the variation of the surface stress charge coefficient of Pt in weakly adsorbing aqueous solutions of NaF of various concentrations. As the concentration is reduced, we find initially an increase in the magnitude of the surface stress-charge coefficient, followed by saturation at a value of -1.9V. Since specific adsorption is expected to be reduced as the solution become more diluted, in favor of the capacitive charging, the results support the notion that changes in the bonding between the metal atoms control the variation in the surface stress during double-layer charging.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 876: Symposium A – Nanoporous and Nanostructured Materials for Catalysis, Sensor and Gas Separation Applications , 2005 , R8.37
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Gleiter, H., Weissmüller, J., Wollersheim, O., and Würschum, R., Acta mater. 49, 737 (2001).Google Scholar
2. Weissmüller, J., Viswanath, R. N., Kramer, D., Zimmer, P.., Würschum, R., Gleiter, H., Science 300, 312 (2003).Google Scholar
3. Kramer, D., Viswanath, R.N., Weissmüller, J., Nano Lett. 4, 793 (2004).Google Scholar
4. Cammarata, R.C. and Sieradzki, K., Annu. Rev. Mater. Sci. 24, 215 (1994).Google Scholar
5. Ibach, H., Surface Science Reports 29, 193 (1997).Google Scholar
6. Haiss, W., Rep. Prog. Phys. 64, 591 (2001).Google Scholar
7. Beck, T. R., Lin, K.-F., J. Electrochem. Soc. 126, 252 (1979).Google Scholar
8. Seo, M., Serizawa, Y., J. Electrochem. Soc. 150, E472 (2003).Google Scholar
9. Lipowski, J., Schmickler, W., Kolb, D.M., Parsons, R., J. Electroanal Chem. 452, 193 (1998).Google Scholar
10. Viswanath, R. N., Kramer, D., Weissmüller, J., Langmuir 21, 4604 (2005).Google Scholar
11. Vasiljevic, N., Trimble, T., Dmitrov, N., Sieradzki, K., Langmuir 20, 6639 (2004).Google Scholar
12. Although is defined as the variation of f at constant tangential strain e, all experimental techniques used so far to measure, including dilatometry on porous metals as well as cantilever bending, involve surface strain. Nonetheless, it has been argued that the resulting systematic error in determining is within the limits of the experimental resolution [10].Google Scholar
13. Weissmüller, J., Cahn, J.W., Acta. Mater. 45, 1899 (1997).Google Scholar