Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T01:49:39.783Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Interfacial Adhesion Study of Porous Low-K Dielectrics to CVD Barrier Layers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Jeffrey A. Lee
Affiliation:
International Sematech, Interconnect Division, 2706 Montopolis Drive, Austin, TX 78741
Jeffrey T. Wetzel
Affiliation:
Tokyo Electron America, Inc.
Caroline Merrill
Affiliation:
University of Texas-Austin, Microelectronics Research Center, Austin, TX
Paul S. Ho
Affiliation:
University of Texas-Austin, Microelectronics Research Center, Austin, TX
Get access

Abstract

The present paper discusses the four-point bending technique employed at The University of Texas at Austin (UT Austin) to characterize adhesion strength of ultra low-k dielectric materials to CVD barrier layers. Adhesion energy between an ultra low-k dielectric material and a barrier layer was measured as a function of porosity (2.0 < k < 2.3). It was found that the fracture energy decreases with the dielectric constant, which correlates with mechanical properties such as Young's modulus and hardness. Adhesion measurement data was also obtained for different lowk / barrier layer interfaces. The independence of interfacial fracture energy on the type of interface suggests that cohesive failure occurs in the low-k material layer and not at the interface. In addition, the very low fracture energies (G < 3 J/2) confirm the weak mechanical properties of such highly porous materials. Experimental results are illustrated with analysis of failure surfaces using Auger Electron Spectroscopy and Scanning Electron Microscopy.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Liu, S., Mei, Y. and Wu, T. Y. “Bimaterial Interfacial Crack Growth as a Function of Mode-Mixity”, IEEE Trans-CPMT-A, Vol. 18, No. 3 (1995), pp. 618626.Google Scholar
2. Charalambides, P.G., Lund, J., Evans, A.G. and McMeeking, R.M., “A test Specimen for Determining the Fracture Resistance of Bimaterial Interfaces”, J. App. Mech., Vol. 56, 1989, pp. 7782.Google Scholar
3. Gidley, D. W., Frieze, W.E., Dull, T.L, Yee, A.F., Ryan, E.T., and Ho, H. M., Phys. Rev. BGoogle Scholar
4. Wu, W. L, Wallace, W. E., Lin, E. K., Lynn, G.W., Glinka, C. J., Ryan, E.T., and Ho, H. M., Appl. Phys. Vol 87, 2000, 1193 Google Scholar
5. Fernlund, G. and Spelt, J. K., “Mixed-mode Fracture Characterization of Adhesive Joints”, Composites Science and Technology, Vol. 50, 1994, pp. 441449. 60, R5157-5160 (1999).Google Scholar