Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T08:11:55.093Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Interaction of Eu(III) and Th(IV) With Sulfate-Resisting Portland Cement

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

E. Wieland ,
J. Tits ,
P. Spieler  and
J.P. Dobler
E. Wieland
Affiliation:
Waste Management Laboratory, Paul Scherrer Institute, CH-5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland
J. Tits
Affiliation:
Waste Management Laboratory, Paul Scherrer Institute, CH-5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland
P. Spieler
Affiliation:
Waste Management Laboratory, Paul Scherrer Institute, CH-5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland
J.P. Dobler
Affiliation:
Waste Management Laboratory, Paul Scherrer Institute, CH-5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland
Get access

Abstract

The uptake of Eu(III) and Th(IV) by a sulphate-resisting Portland cement has been investigated in batch type sorption experiments using 152 Eu and 234Th as tracers. Prior to performing sorption studies, the experimental methodology was assessed. The kinetics of Eu(III) and Th(IV) interactions with cement were measured for times up to about 130 days. The effect of isosaccharinic acid added to artificial cement pore water on Eu(III) and Th(IV) uptake was examined to elucidate the effect of cellulose degradation products.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 506: Symposium – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XXI , 1997 , 573
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Glasser, F.P., Cem. Concr. Res. 22, 201 (1992).Google Scholar
2 Cocke, D.L. and Mollah, M.Y.A. in Chemistry and Microstructures of Solidified Waste Forms, edited by Spence, R.D. (CRC Press Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL, 1993), pp. 187–242.Google Scholar
3 Bradbury, M.H. and Sarott, F.A., PSI Report No. 95–06, Paul Scherrer Institute, Wurenlingen and Villigen, Switzerland (1994).Google Scholar
4 Loon, L.R. van, Glaus, M.A., Laube, A. and Stallone, S., Environ. Sci. Technol. 31, 1243 (1997).Google Scholar
5 Berner, U., Radiochimica Acta 44/45, 387 (1988).Google Scholar
6 Dyrssen, D., Sv. Kem. T. (Svensk Kemisk Tidskrift) 62, 153 (1950).Google Scholar
7 Loon, L.R. van, Glaus, M.A., Stallone, S. and Laube, A., PSI Internal Report TM-44-96-01, Paul Scherrer Institute, Wirenlingen and Villigen, Switzerland (1996).Google Scholar
8 Hayes, K.F. and Leckie, J.O. in Geochemical Processes at Mineral Surfaces, edited by Davis, J.A. and Hayes, K.F. (ACS Symp. Ser 323, 1986.), pp.114–141.Google Scholar
9 Schubert, J. and Lindenbaum, A., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 74, 2532 (1952).Google Scholar