Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-xq9c7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-30T21:29:57.173Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Integrin-Mediated Fibroblast Adhesion Strength: Role of the β1 Subunit

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

Kelly A. Ward
Affiliation:
School of Chemical Engineering and NY State College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853
Jun-Lin Guan
Affiliation:
Veterinary Pathology, NY State College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853
Daniel A. Hammer
Affiliation:
School of Chemical Engineering and NY State College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853
Get access

Abstract

Cell-substratum adhesion is important in wound healing [4], embryogenic development [11], tissue architecture [6], and metastasis [7]. Integrins constitute a major class of heterodimeric cell-surface glycoproteins involved in receptor-mediated adhesion to the extracellular matrix (ECM). Focal contacts are regions of the cell-substratum adhesion in which clusters of integrin receptors connect the cytoskeleton to extracellular matrix molecules such as fibronectin. Focal contacts strengthen cell-substrate adhesion, and are sites of biochemical activity. Since cell adhesion strength in part depends on the cell's ability to cluster receptors and cytoskeleton into focal contacts, the integrity of the focal contact, and hence a cell's adhesive strength, will depend both on integrin-cytoskeletal binding as well as integrin-ligand binding.

Using a centrifugation assay, we have quantified cell-substratum adhesion strength of mouse 3T3 cells transfected with the avian β1 integrin receptor (wild type), including various deletion mutants of its cytoplasmic domain, to surfaces containing varying concentrations of CSAT, a monoclonal antibody against the extracellular domain of the avian β1 subunit. For all the transfectants, adhesion strength decreases with decreasing CSAT concentration and increasing centrifugal strength. Different truncations of the cytoplasmic domain lead to different levels of adhesion. There is no simple correlation between the length of the cytoplasmic domain and the strength of adhesion.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Burridge, K., Fath, K.,Kelly, T., Nuckolls, G., and Turner, C., Annu. Rev.Cell Biol. 4, 487 (1988).Google Scholar
2. Guan, J.-L. and Shalloway, D., Nature 358, 690 (1992).Google Scholar
3. Guan, J.-L., Trevithick, J. E., and Hynes, R. O., Cell Regulation 2, 951 (1991).Google Scholar
4. Hertly, M. D., Kubler, M.-D., Leigh, I. M., and Watt, F. M., Journal of Clinical Investigation 89, 1892 (1992).Google Scholar
5. Hynes, R. O., Cell 69 (1), 11 (1992).Google Scholar
6. Lampugnani, M. G., Resnati, M., Dejana, E., and Marchisio, P. C., Journal of Cell Biology 112 (3), 479 (1991).Google Scholar
7. Lester, B. R. and McCarthy, J. B., Cancer and Metastasis Review 11, 31 (1992).Google Scholar
8. Lotz, M. M., Burdsal, C. A., Erickson, H. P., and McClay, D. R., Journal of Cell Biology 109, 1795 (1989).Google Scholar
9. Marcantonio, E. E., Guan, J.-L., Trevithick, J. E., and Hynes, R. O., Cell Regulation 1, 597 (1990).Google Scholar
10. McClay, D. R., Wessel, G. M., and Marchase, R. B., PNAS USA, 78 (8), 4975 (1981).Google Scholar
11. Naidet, C., Semeriva, M., Yamada, K. M. and Thiery, J. P., Nature 325, 348 (1987).Google Scholar
12. Schnaar, R. L., Brandley, B. K., Needham, L. K., Swank-Hill, P., and Blackburn, C. C., Methods In Enzymology 179, 542 (1989).Google Scholar
13. Ward, M. D., and Hammer, D.A., Biophysical Journal 64, 936 (1993).Google Scholar