Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-2l2gl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-27T16:41:25.832Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Influence of Surface Step Density on the Growth of Mercury Cadmium Telluride by Molecular Beam Epitaxy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2011

T. Colin
Affiliation:
Norwegian Defence Research Establishment, Division for Electronics, PO Box 25, N-2007 Kjeller, Norway
D. Minsås
Affiliation:
Norwegian Defence Research Establishment, Division for Electronics, PO Box 25, N-2007 Kjeller, Norway
S. Gjøen
Affiliation:
Norwegian Defence Research Establishment, Division for Electronics, PO Box 25, N-2007 Kjeller, Norway
R. Sizmann
Affiliation:
Norwegian Defence Research Establishment, Division for Electronics, PO Box 25, N-2007 Kjeller, Norway
S. Løvold
Affiliation:
Norwegian Defence Research Establishment, Division for Electronics, PO Box 25, N-2007 Kjeller, Norway
Get access

Abstract

We report for the first time the results of structural and optical characterizations performed on Mercury Cadmium Telluride (MCT) grown simultaneously by Molecular Beam Epitaxy (MBE) on (11 1)B 4°misoriented and (211)B CdZnTe substrates. These two Te-terminated surfaces differ only by the density and the nature of their surface steps. In MBE conditions we do not observe any difference of incorporation between the two orientations at low growth temperatures and only a slight difference in Te and Hg incorporations above 200°C. This study confirms that the growth mode is essentially the same on both orientations and the growth proceeds by step-flow. The higher step density on (211) surfaces allows broader tolerances on the substrate temperature for the growth of twin-free material. It also leads to higher crystalline quality for the lowest temperatures. These observations have been confirmed by magneto-absorption experiments on superlattices grown simultaneously on both orientations.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Koestner, R.J and Schaake, H.F, J.Vac. Sci. Technol. A 6 (4) 2824 (1988)Google Scholar
2. Arias, J.M, Shin, S.H, Pasko, J.G, DeWames, R.E, Gertner, E.R, J.Appl. Phys. 65 (4) 1747 (1989)Google Scholar
3. Zandian, M., Arias, J.M, Zucca, R., Gil, R.V, Shin, S.H, Appl. Phys. Lett. 59 (9) 1022 (1991)Google Scholar
4. Destefanis, G. and Chamonal, J.P, J. Electron. Mater. 22 (8) 1027 (1993)Google Scholar
5. Colin, T., Thèse de Doctorat, Université Joseph Fourier-Grenoble I, 1991 Google Scholar
6. Million, A., Colin, T., Ferret, P., Zanatta, J.P, Bouchut, P., Destefanis, G.L and Bablet, J., J. Cryst. Growth 127 291 (1993)Google Scholar
7. Snyder, D.W., Ko, E.I., Mahajan, S. and Sides, P.J. in Long-Wavelength Semiconductor Devices. Materials. and Processes, edited by Katz, A., Biefeld, R.M., Gunshor, R.L. and Malik, R.J. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 216, Boston, MA, 1990) pp.4146 Google Scholar
8. Cinader, G., Raizman, A. and Sher, A., J.Vac. Sci. Technol. B 9 (3) 1634 (1991)Google Scholar
9. Skauli, T., Colin, T. and Lovold, S., to be published in J.Vac. Sci. Technol. A 12 (2) (1994)Google Scholar
10. Singh, J. and Arias, J., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 7 (4) 2562 (1989)Google Scholar
11. Gailliard, J.P., Revue Phys. Appl. 22 457 (1987)Google Scholar