Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T22:43:09.022Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Influence of Salinity on The Hydraulic Conductivity of Compacted Bentonite

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2011

Won-Jin Cho
Affiliation:
Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute P.O. Box 105, Yusong, Taejon 305-606, Korea
Jae-Owan Lee
Affiliation:
Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute P.O. Box 105, Yusong, Taejon 305-606, Korea
Chul-Hyung Kang
Affiliation:
Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute P.O. Box 105, Yusong, Taejon 305-606, Korea
Get access

Abstract

The effect of salinity on hydraulic conductivities of compacted bentonites with various dry densities was studied. The hydraulic conductivities increase with increasing salinity only when the dry density of bentonite is relatively low. The degree of increase becomes more remarkable at a lower dry density of bentonite. For bentonites with densities of 1.0 Mg/m3 and 1.2 Mg/m3, the hydraulic conductivities associated with the 0.4 M NaCl solution increase beyond those associated with the fresh water solution by factor of 7 and 3 times, respectively. However, for the bentonite with dry density higher than 1.4 Mg/m3, the salinity has an insignificant effect on the hydraulic conductivities, and the hydraulic conductivity is nearly constant within the salinity range of 0 to 0.4 M NaCl.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Simmons, G. R. and Baumgartner, P., “The disposal of Canada's nuclear fuel waste: engineering for a disposal facility,” Atomic Energy of Canada Limited Report, AECL-10715 (1994).Google Scholar
2. SKBF/KBS, “Final storage of spent fuel - KBS-3”, Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co. (1983).Google Scholar
3. Wareham, D. G., Farajollabi, A. and Milke, M. K., Wat. Sci. Tech., 38, 151 (1998).Google Scholar
4. Mersi, G. and Olsen, R. E., Geotechnique, 21, 341 (1971).Google Scholar
5. Hardcastle, J. H. and Mitchell, J. K., Clay and Clay Minerals, 22, 143 (1974).Google Scholar
6. Dunn, R. J. and Mitchell, J. K., J. of Geotechnical Engineering, 110, 1448 (1984).Google Scholar
7. Cho, W. J., Lee, J. O., Chun, K. S. and Hahn, D. S., J. of the Korean Nuclear Society, 31, 39 (1999).Google Scholar
8. Whitfield, M. and Jagner, D., Marine Electrochemistry, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1981.Google Scholar
9. Olphen, H. van, Clay Colloid Chemistry, 2nd ed., Krieger Publishing Company, Malabar, 1991.Google Scholar
10. Fernandez, F. and Quigley, R. M., Can. Geotech. J., 22, 205 (1985).Google Scholar
11. Fernandez, F. and Quigley, R. M., Can. Geotech. J., 25, 582 (1988).Google Scholar
12. Mitchell, J. K., Fundamentals of Soil Behavior, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1976.Google Scholar