Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T15:10:10.828Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Improving the Understanding of Ion-Beam-Induced Defect Formation and Evolution by Atomistic Computer Simulations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 March 2011

Matthias Posselt*
Affiliation:
Forschungszentrum Rossendorf, Institute of Ion Beam Physics and Materials Research, P.O.Box 510119, D-01314 Dresden, Germany
Get access

Abstract

The morphology of the as-implanted damage in silicon is investigated using a recently developed combination of time-ordered computer simulations based on the binary collision approximation (BCA) with classical molecular dynamics (MD) calculations. The method is applied to determine the type and the amount of defects formed within the first nanosecond after ion impact. The depth profile and the total number of different defect species (vacancies, interstitials, disordered atoms, etc.) produced on average per incident ion are calculated for B+ (15 keV), P+ (5, 10, 20, 30 keV), and As+ (15 keV) implantations. It is shown that the as- implanted defect structure depends not only on the nuclear energy deposition per ion but also explicitly on the ion mass. Therefore for each ion species the damage morphology exhibits characteristic features. For heavy ions the percentage of extended defects is higher than for light ions. In all cases investigated the number of free or isolated interstitials exceeds the amount of free vacancies. The results obtained allow a microscopic interpretation of the phenomenological model for the as-implanted damage employed in conventional BCA simulations in order to describe the dose dependence of the shape of ion range profiles. They can be also applied to get more realistic initial conditions for the simulation of the defect kinetics during post-implantation annealing.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Posselt, M., Schmidt, B., Murthy, C. S., Feudel, T. and Suzuki, K., J. Electrochem. Soc. 144, 1495 (1997).Google Scholar
2. Jaraiz, M., Gilmer, G. H., Poate, J. M. and Rubia, T. Diaz de la, Appl. Phys. Lett. 68, 409 (1996).Google Scholar
3. Posselt, M., Schmidt, B., Feudel, T. and Strecker, N., Materials Science and Engineering B71, 128 (2000).Google Scholar
4. Caturla, M. J., Rubia, T. Diaz de la, Marques, L. A. and Gilmer, G. H., Phys. Rev. B54, 16683 (1996).Google Scholar
5. Stillinger, F. H. and Weber, T. A., Phys. Rev. B31, 5262 (1985).Google Scholar
6. Ziegler, J. F., Biersack, J. P. and Littmark, U., The Stopping and Range of Ions in Solids (Pergamon Press, New York, 1985).Google Scholar
7. Lindhard, J. and Scharff, M., Phys. Rev. 124, 128 (1961).Google Scholar
8. Berendsen, H. J. C., Postma, J. P. M., Gunsteren, W. F. van, DiNola, A. and Haak, J. R., J. Chem. Phys. 81, 3684 (1984).Google Scholar
9. Nordlund, K., Ghaly, M., Averback, R. S., Caturla, M., Rubia, T. Diaz de la and Taurus, J., Phys. Rev. B57, 7556 (1998).Google Scholar
10. Napolitani, E., Carnera, A., Schroer, E., Privitera, V., Priolo, F. and Moffat, S., Appl. Phys. Lett. 75, 1869 (1999).Google Scholar