Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T16:16:01.627Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Improvement of Ohmie Contacts on GaAs with In-Situ Cleaning

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

F. Ren
Affiliation:
AT&T Bell Laboratories Murray Hill, New Jersey 07974
S. J. Pearton
Affiliation:
AT&T Bell Laboratories Murray Hill, New Jersey 07974
T. R. Fullowan
Affiliation:
AT&T Bell Laboratories Murray Hill, New Jersey 07974
W. S. Hobson
Affiliation:
AT&T Bell Laboratories Murray Hill, New Jersey 07974
S. N. G. Chu
Affiliation:
AT&T Bell Laboratories Murray Hill, New Jersey 07974
A. B. Emerson
Affiliation:
AT&T Bell Laboratories Murray Hill, New Jersey 07974
Get access

Abstract

An in-situ argon ion-mill clean step prior to ohmic metal deposition combined with a Mo barrier layer AuGe based ohmic metallization which is compatible with dry-etch process have been demonstrated to improve the uniformity of the contact parameters and reduce the contact resistance. After ion mill cleaning, the native oxide regrowth of MBE grown GaAs and AlGaAs layers in vacuum chamber was also studied to optimize the processing. These oxide layers were identified as the cause of problems in the formation of good ohmic contacts to the GaAs or AlGaAs, the Mo diffraction barrier also reduced the contact resistivity with excellent adesion, smooth morphology, and sharp edge definition.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Christ, R. S., Proc. of U.S. conf. on GaAs Man. Tech., (IEEE, NY, 1989) p. 44.Google Scholar
2. Shih, X. C., Murakmi, M., Wikie, E. L., and Callegari, A. C., J. Appl. Phys., 62, 582, (1987).Google Scholar
3. Heime, K., Konig, U., Kohn, E., and Wortmann, A., Solid-St. Electron, 17, 835, (1974).Google Scholar
4. Callegari, A., Lacey, U., and Pan, E. T-S., Solid-St. Electron., 29, 523, (1986).Google Scholar
5. Higman, T. K., Emanuel, M. A. and Coleman, J. J., J. Appl. Phys., 60 677 (1986).Google Scholar
6. Jones, W. L., Eastman, L. F., IEEE Trans. Electron Devices, ED–33, 712 (1986).Google Scholar
7. Berger, H. H., J. Electrochem. Soc., 119, 507 (1972).Google Scholar
8. Hayama, N., Okamoto, A., Madihian, M. and Honjo, K., IEEE Devices Lett., EDL–8, 246 (1987).Google Scholar