Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-9q27g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T15:37:20.028Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Improved Carbon Anode Materials for Lithium-Ion Cells

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

J. Flynn
Affiliation:
Yardney Technical Products, Inc. 82 Mechanic Street, Pawcatuck, CT 06379
C. Marsh
Affiliation:
Yardney Technical Products, Inc. 82 Mechanic Street, Pawcatuck, CT 06379
Get access

Abstract

Several carbon materials have been studied for suitability as anode materials in lithium-ion cells. Carbons that have been included in this evaluation are three grades of commercially available mesophase carbon microbeads (MCMB) 6–28, 10–28 and 25–28, two specially prepared mesophase fibers (Amoco), a foreign mesophase fiber and KS-15 graphite (Lonza). Differences in cycling behavior between the three types of MCMB material are shown. Data of full lithium-ion cells demonstrate the effect that the choice of carbon material has on the cell discharge voltage and capacity. Lithium reference electrode experiments in full cells (3.0–4.0Ah capacity), elucidate the dynamics under several charge/discharge regimes and provide a comparison between the performance of carbon fiber and graphite anode materials. These test results indicate that the fibers can be charged at significantly higher rates than graphite without showing polarization at the anode. Full and half cell data also demonstrates the high coulombic efficiencies of the mesophase materials and first cycle efficiencies as compared to graphite. A comparison of two mesophase materials with different textures in full cells under strenuous cycling conditions shows significant differences in capacity retention. SEM photos of fibers showing the different textures are also presented.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Tatsumi, K., Iwashita, N., Sakebe, H., Shioyama, H., Higuchi, S., Mabuchi, A. and Fujimoto, H., J. Electrochemical Society 142, 716 (1995).10.1149/1.2048523Google Scholar
2. Mabuchi, A., Fujimoto, H., Tokumitsu, K. and Kasuh, T., J. Electrochemical Society 142, 3049(1995).10.1149/1.2048684Google Scholar
3. Kitagawa, M., Koshina, H., Ohta, A., The 14th International Seminar on Primary and Secondary Battery Technology and Application, March, 1997.Google Scholar
4. Takarni, N., Satoh, A, Haraand, M., Ohsaki, T., J. Electrochemical Society 142, 2564 (1995).Google Scholar
5. Tran, T.D., Feikert, J. H., Pekala, R.W. and Kinoshita, K., J. Applied Electrochemistry 26, 1161(1996).10.1007/BF00243741Google Scholar
6. Proceedings for the Electrochemical Society, Montreal Conference, Spring Meeting, 1997.Google Scholar
7. Imanishi, N., Kashiwagi, H., Ichikawa, T., Takeda, Y., Yamamoto, O. and Inagaki, M., J. Electrochemical Society 140, 315, (1993).10.1149/1.2221044Google Scholar
8. Billaud, D., Henry, F. X., Willman, P., J. Power Sources 54, 383 (1995).10.1016/0378-7753(94)02107-EGoogle Scholar
9. Matsumura, Y., Wang, S., and Mondori, J., J. Electrochemical Society 142, 2914 (1995).10.1149/1.2048665Google Scholar
10. DrMcCarthy, Neil, Amoco Performance Products (private communication).Google Scholar