Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T02:15:50.898Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Hydroxylapatite/Plaster Implantation for the Treatment of Severe Periodontal Osseous Defects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

Reynolds A. Carnevale
Affiliation:
Dental Research Center and Department of Periodontics, School of Dentistry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7455
George W. Greco
Affiliation:
Dental Research Center and Department of Periodontics, School of Dentistry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7455
Cindy M. Bullard
Affiliation:
Dental Research Center and Department of Periodontics, School of Dentistry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7455
Jacob S. Hanker
Affiliation:
Dental Research Center and Department of Periodontics, School of Dentistry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7455
Get access

Abstract

Infrabony defects of 230 periodontal patients have been treated surgically by implantation. These lesions of alveolar bone, up to nineteen per patient, generally displayed pocket depths of at least 8mm and were associated with teeth showing pronounced mobility. Approximately 50% of these teeth could have ordinarily been condemned to extraction. In this study, scaling, root planing, and polishing were performed and patients were instructed in oral hygiene measures prior to surgical implantation. A 1:1 mixture of dense sintered hydroxylapatite(HA) particles (OrthoMatrix HA-500) with plaster of Paris (USG Medical Grade Calcium Sulfate Hemihydrate B, containing 0.85% K2SO4) was moistened with a minimum amount of saline. The mixture was then implanted into the dried defect. After setting, the operative site was closed with silk sutures. The plaster bound the HA particles in the defects and prevented particle straying which frequently occurs when they are implanted with saline alone or with other vehicles. There was an almost immediate and sustained diminution in tooth mobility at most implantation sites. Good retention of particles was seen on physical and radiographic examination of most defects for the length of the study (5 years). Overall, there was a marked reduction in pocket depth and improvement in tissue tone and texture. Less than 1% of the teeth at the implantation sites have been lost. No significant inflammation has been observed. Increased radiopacity and resistance to probing suggest bone formation in some implanted defects. Implantation of periodontal osseous defects with the biocompatible HA/plaster composite appears to result in the clinical cessation of progressive periodontal disease.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Nisengard, R.J., Newman, M.G. and Zambon, J.J. in Oral Microbiology and Immunology, edited by Newman, M.G. and Nisengard, R. (W.B. Saunders Company, Philadelphia, 1988, p. 422).Google Scholar
2. Socransky, S.S.. J. Periodontol. 48, 497 (1977).Google Scholar
3. Slots, J.. J. Clin. Periodontol. 6, 351 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Holt, S.C. in Host-Parasite Interactions in Periodontal Diseases, edited by Genco, R.J. and Mergenhagen, S.E. (Amer. Soc. Microbiol., Washington, DC, 1982, p. 139).Google Scholar
5. Gregory, S.H., J. Periodont. Res. 23, 7 (1988).Google Scholar
6. Armitage, G.C., Sranberg, G.K. and Loe, H.. J. Clin. Periodontol. 4, 173 (1977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Haffajee, A.D., Socransky, S.S. and Goodson, J.M.. J. Clin. Periodontol. 10, 257 (1983).Google Scholar
8. Dzink, J.L., Tanner, A.C.R., Haffajee, A.D. and Socransky, S.S.. J. Clin. Periodontol. 12, 468 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Sanders, J.J., Sepe, W.W., Bowers, G.M., Koch, R.W., Williams, J.E., Lakas, J.S., Mellonig, J.T., Pelleau, G.B. Jr. and Gambil, V.. J. Periodontol. 54, 1 (1983).Google Scholar
10. Mellonig, J.T., Int. J. Periodont. Rest. Dent. 4 (6) 41 (1984).Google Scholar
11. Shaffer, C.D. and App, G.R.. J. Periodontol. 42, 685 (1971).Google Scholar
12. Hanker, J.S., Tucker, M.R., Terry, Bill C., Carnevale, R.A. and Giammara, B.L.. Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 55, 77 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar